Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why the cl_loss can be a negative number on the tranferlearning dataset chem? #23

Closed
check-777 opened this issue Apr 21, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@check-777
Copy link

check-777 commented Apr 21, 2021

image

@ha-lins
Copy link

ha-lins commented May 18, 2021

Thanks for your help. I wonder if this problem is fixed and reproduce the pretraining performance successfully. Are the downstream performance close to the paper results for the latest version of pyG? Hope to chat more about this via WeChat (ls825521138).

@peizhenbai
Copy link

peizhenbai commented Jul 28, 2022

Hi @ha-lins @check-777,

Hope you are doing well. I also meet the same issue while reproducing transfer learning result. May I ask what the reason is and whether it is fixed in your implementation? Thank you very much.

@yyou1996
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @pz-white,

Please refer to another issue per my answer #50.

@peizhenbai
Copy link

peizhenbai commented Aug 14, 2022

Hi @pz-white,

Please refer to another issue per my answer #50.

@yyou1996 Thank you so much, Yuning! That's very helpful to me :-)

Hope to have a nice day!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants