Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add rule S6679 (no-self-compare): Number.isNaN() should be used to check for NaN value #4040

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 26, 2023
Merged

Add rule S6679 (no-self-compare): Number.isNaN() should be used to check for NaN value #4040

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 26, 2023

Conversation

alex-sonar
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #3921

@sonarqube-next
Copy link

SonarQube Quality Gate

Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 1 Code Smell

100.0% 100.0% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@alex-sonar alex-sonar enabled auto-merge (squash) July 26, 2023 15:14
@alex-sonar alex-sonar merged commit bf244d4 into master Jul 26, 2023
18 checks passed
@alex-sonar alex-sonar deleted the issue-3921 branch July 26, 2023 15:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@victor-diez-sonarsource victor-diez-sonarsource victor-diez-sonarsource approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create rule S6679 (no-self-compare): Number.isNaN() should be used to check for NaN value
2 participants
@alex-sonar @victor-diez-sonarsource