-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 433
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Licensing #953
Comments
I'm fine with MIT or ISC https://gist.github.com/indexzero/10602128 |
So, how can we make progress with this? I don't expect that much more feedback on the issue. For several projects, it's not clear what license is actually being used right now. In theory, we'd have to contact all contributors and ask them if they're fine with the "new" license, wouldn't we? |
Yeah I think so. @Strider-CD/collaborators @Strider-CD/core |
I'm also fine with either MIT or ISC. |
I would personally prefer MIT. |
As the original creator of Strider, I should chime in here. I used the ISC or MIT license (forget which). Basically the same licensing Either is acceptable to me. Nobody has mentioned it, but I am not a fan of I believe that companies should be able to use and modify my free software Good luck! On Friday, July 15, 2016, Michael Mior notifications@github.com wrote:
Niall O'Higgins |
Here's a quick overview of licenses declared in Generated with https://github.com/oliversalzburg/strider-dev/blob/master/bin/license.js |
I noticed some problems with the licenses set for some Strider modules:
First of all, BSD is not a valid SPDX license. The correct replacement would likely be BSD-3-Clause, which is used in the main strider repo and, to my knowledge, Strider should be "BSD licensed" (that's what Wikipedia says anyway). However, the
LICENSE.md
in the strider repo is very obviously the MIT license.So, which license is the correct one?
Second, the license, that is deemed correct for the strider project, should be applied to all modules and the correct SPDX string should be put into the
package.json
.In case there is a vote for a license, I vote MIT.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: