You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was thinking about changing some of the repository settings and would like to get your feedback on this.
Since this project is pretty popular with over 30'000 downloads a month on npm I think it would be useful to protect the master branch. I would recommend the following settings to make sure we do not merge any faulty and unreviewed code.
Furthermore it would be cool if we could decide on a merging style. I don't really have an opinion on the merging style but if there is the option to standardize the merges it might be useful.
I am keen to hear your opinions.
Thanks,
Daniel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @chdanielmueller,
It makes sense, of course. Actually, it's a pretty popular thing to have, so I'm for it. Although not a lot of development happens from several developers on a branch at the moment, I'd even suggest that only squash merging is allowed without rebase on master.
I think that forcing tests to run is an excellent idea.
re: squash merge, This tends to be very popular and I do think it's a good idea. The only issue i see with this revolves around more than one user making changes to a PR (like @kalinchernev this isn't very likely), but this does affect Contributions. Only the opener of a PR and the person merging the commit will get the contribution.
Hi @kalinchernev and @drGrove
I was thinking about changing some of the repository settings and would like to get your feedback on this.
Since this project is pretty popular with over 30'000 downloads a month on npm I think it would be useful to protect the master branch. I would recommend the following settings to make sure we do not merge any faulty and unreviewed code.
Furthermore it would be cool if we could decide on a merging style. I don't really have an opinion on the merging style but if there is the option to standardize the merges it might be useful.
I am keen to hear your opinions.
Thanks,
Daniel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: