[#12588] Add tests to question constraint #12747
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
weiquu
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2024
cedricongjh
added a commit
to cedricongjh/teammates
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2024
* create tests for constsum-recipient-question-constraint * add unit tests for ContributionQuestionConstraintComponent * fix lint issues
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #12588
Outline of Solution
Add unit tests for improve codecov for questionconstraint: https://app.codecov.io/github/TEAMMATES/teammates/tree/master/src%2Fweb%2Fapp%2Fcomponents%2Fquestion-types%2Fquestion-constraint
utilised new builder, placed them in the test file instead of a central location (lmk if theres any comments on this)
also for descriptions, i would like to propose that we include the method name that we are testing if it is a test for a particular function, which is the way its done in this PR