Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

example example discusses a possible future feature #2315

Closed
sydb opened this issue Jun 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

example example discusses a possible future feature #2315

sydb opened this issue Jun 19, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@sydb
Copy link
Member

sydb commented Jun 19, 2022

The <egXML> tagdoc has an example of <egXML> (itself, of course, encoded as an <egXML>) that purports to be a slide (from a lecture about TEI) that explains <egXML>. It contains the bullet point

  <item>The <att>rend</att> attribute in the TEI namespace can be
  used for recording how parts of the example was rendered</item>

This is a possible solution to the general problem of highlighting within examples (see at least #1632 and #1928, probably others). But it is one that, to my knowledge, has neither been agreed to nor implemented. The prose in the <remarks> spoke of it until 2018-01-19, at which time @jamescummings removed it “until [a] real mechanism [is] agreed [to]”, probably because this runs smack into the fact that attributes, by default, are in no namespace.

My instinct is to just change that last <item> to something entirely different, like

  <item>The <att>source</att> attribute can (and should) be used to
  point to a bibliographic citation for the example.</item>
@sydb
Copy link
Member Author

sydb commented Jun 19, 2022

Assigning to @jamescummings to approve or disapprove or shed light on why this is not a problem or some such. If he and I agree on a solution, assigned to myself to implement. (Unless you want to @jamescummings, in which case go right ahead. :-)

@sydb sydb changed the title example example discusses the a possible future feature example example discusses a possible future feature Jun 25, 2022
@sydb
Copy link
Member Author

sydb commented Oct 20, 2022

Duplicates #2222. (Which has by now been fixed.)

@sydb sydb closed this as completed Oct 20, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants