You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 20, 2024. It is now read-only.
If we are not done adding analytics, we should probably get some specification of what kinds of tracking we need to add specifically for "mvp". If we are done or have no specific requirements, issues can be opened for further requirements as they are decided.
Maybe there should be. I don't know. But I have a point of process here, which is part of trying to manage a transition away from "one-developer project" and just clean up the backlog because it shouldn't be your job and nobody else is going to do it.
Ideally, I want feature requests to come from specific people inside TNRIS who decided to advocate for that request, not just be an impersonal "there should be" which is really generated by a developer. Then we get a lot of stuff on the backlog nobody asked for.
Ideally, I want feature requests to be requirements from stakeholders, not nebulous "shoulds" which aren't part of acceptance criteria. Otherwise the backlog piles up with stuff that isn't really meant to be acted on, or not necessarily meant to be acted on.
Ideally, I want each request to be defined, at least as far as the stakeholder can define it, but no open-ended "things like." Then we get a backlog piled up with issues that can't close and can absorb any amount of development time because there is no scope.
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: