Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarification regarding app hosting behavior & Support for local hosting #19

Open
vgalin opened this issue Sep 7, 2023 · 7 comments
Open

Comments

@vgalin
Copy link

vgalin commented Sep 7, 2023

Hello, I recently tested textual-web within a corporate network and encountered this warning/error:

           INFO     connecting to Ganglion
           WARNING  Unable to connect to Ganglion server. Will reattempt connection soon.

This led me to realize that apps run through textual-web are not hosted locally but are instead served from a third-party server, generating a unique URL. I find this worth mentioning explicitly in the README for clarity and to set proper user expectations, especially because this behavior deviates from the original textual where the 'apps' were obviously run locally.

Could you consider updating the README to specify this information?

Additionally, are there any plans to support local hosting of Textual apps using textual-web in the future?

@willmcgugan
Copy link
Collaborator

We will add a section explaining how it works on the README.

We plan to have an "on prem" solution at some point. The SaaS offering will allow us to refine the produce first.

@davep
Copy link
Contributor

davep commented Sep 8, 2023

this behavior deviates from the original textual where the 'apps' were obviously run locally

Just to be clear too: your applications are still run "locally"; as in they're still run on the machine that you're running textual-web on; but the communication with the client browser goes via our servers.

@pavelklymenko
Copy link

Is there a way to test fully locally as of today? Or the SaaS part of it is an integral part of the solution and can’t be left aside?

@willmcgugan
Copy link
Collaborator

It depends on a server component that we host, which you can't yet run locally.

@pavelklymenko
Copy link

It depends on a server component that we host, which you can't yet run locally.

Got it. Thanks.

@quinncomendant
Copy link

[A web search led me to this thread, so I'll ask my follow-up question here:]

Is one of the goals of Textual Web to be able to package a CLI app so that it can run in a browser, in a way that I can upload some files to my server to run at mydomain.com/myapp/?

@EricWF
Copy link

EricWF commented Feb 21, 2024

It depends on a server component that we host, which you can't yet run locally.

Is there any update on local hosting here? This seems like a handy tool for local development but I don't want to expose anything to the web.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants