Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide alternative paths for analyzers in addition to standard path. #4

Closed
JohnOmernik opened this issue Feb 16, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@JohnOmernik
Copy link

Provide alternative paths for analyzers in addition to standard path.

Request Type

Feature Request

Problem Description

In the application config, there is a "path to analyzers" field. It would be nice to be able to provide "N" number of paths to analyzers so that we could continue to use the built in analyzers, but also provide other locations that are checked. Each path to analyzers would have it's own config associated (We would have to determine if Global was truly global or global PER path to analyzer).

This would allow folks to create alternate repos of analyzers that could be shared in private circles, whether trust groups, whether internally at an org etc, without having to go through a merging process every time new analyzers are added to the main repo. Basically, Analyzers would first be checked in order, and when the config is parsed, analyzers would have to be globally unique from a naming perspective (Failure causes exit).

It would make ease of upgrade, addition, and management of analyzers much easier at scale.

@saadkadhi saadkadhi added this to the 2.0.0 milestone Feb 16, 2017
@saadkadhi
Copy link
Contributor

This is very important indeed and we have it on our roadmap for Cortex 2. Cortex 2 would have a analyzer store from where you'd be able to pick up the public analyzers you are interested in, and add your own private ones. Analyzers will be provided as dockers for easy deployment and they will be configurable from Cortex 2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants