Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test #87

Open
tang-y-q opened this issue Feb 4, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

test #87

tang-y-q opened this issue Feb 4, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@tang-y-q
Copy link

tang-y-q commented Feb 4, 2023

Hi,thanks for your good job!
I'd like to ask you some questions.
Can I reconstruct my data directly using your trained parameters?
When I use your pre-trained network to reconstruct my data, i get a bad result.
Is this because the network is not generalization capabilities enough?

@ThibaultGROUEIX
Copy link
Owner

Hi @tang-y-q

Can you share an example of your data please?
Are you following this script ? https://github.com/ThibaultGROUEIX/AtlasNet/blob/master/doc/demo.md#usage

Cheers,
Thibault

@tang-y-q
Copy link
Author

tang-y-q commented Feb 6, 2023

Hi @ThibaultGROUEIX
thank you for your reply.
I rebuilt my data according to the method you said, but the effect was not ideal.
And here is my data.
data.zip
I sampled the point cloud on the grid model of turbine blade, and then reconstructed the surface of the point cloud.
However, there is a big gap between the surface I reconstructed and the original model.

best,
Yukon

@ThibaultGROUEIX
Copy link
Owner

Screenshot 2023-02-06 at 18 55 00 Screenshot 2023-02-06 at 18 55 42

Looking at your point cloud and the reconstruction, it's most likely because your point cloud is out of distribution of the ShapeNet dataset (that AtlasNet was trained on).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants