JOSS review: Comments on the paper

[maximelenormand]

I have two general comments on the paper.

• The summary should focus on your package and not on the tidy universe. Please use this section to describe the functionality and purpose of your package for a diverse, non-specialist audience.

• The state of need/field section could be developed by listing the main packages that implement topic models in R (and other languages) and explaining in detail why your software is much better than the other options.

#6800

[TommyJones]

I believe I addressed these issues with this commit 6e8e2f5

Can you confirm that's sufficient (or not)? I'll leave this issue open until then.

[maximelenormand]

That's fine by me. Thanks.

[TommyJones]

Awesome. Thank you so much for your time and effort in reviewing and making both the paper and the tidylda package better.