New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pad all tables to the same height #10
Labels
🤖 code
Changes the implementation
✨ enhancement
Improvement or new feature
🔴 prio: high
Pretty urgent
Comments
jan-ferdinand
added
✨ enhancement
Improvement or new feature
🟡 prio: medium
Not super urgent
🤖 code
Changes the implementation
labels
Aug 8, 2022
jan-ferdinand
added
🔴 prio: high
Pretty urgent
and removed
🟡 prio: medium
Not super urgent
labels
Sep 19, 2022
jan-ferdinand
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 20, 2022
jan-ferdinand
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 20, 2022
Also some padding behavior that has been implemented a while ago but was never properly documented. Also fix the specification with respect to the U32 Table checking whether the operands actually fit in 32 bits, which has been implemented long ago.
jan-ferdinand
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 20, 2022
jan-ferdinand
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 21, 2022
Also some padding behavior that has been implemented a while ago but was never properly documented. Also fix the specification with respect to the U32 Table checking whether the operands actually fit in 32 bits, which has been implemented long ago.
jan-ferdinand
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 22, 2022
jan-ferdinand
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
🤖 code
Changes the implementation
✨ enhancement
Improvement or new feature
🔴 prio: high
Pretty urgent
A Verifier needs to compute (what we call)
unit_distances
from the extension tables'padded_height
s. For that, they currently need to have access to the padded height of all tables, which (for now) is communicated via the proof stream.At a runtime cost for general proving, moving to a single
padded_height
simplifies the Verifier. A simpler Verifier implies a faster runtime for the recursive Verifier. Thus, the proposed change should be implemented.(Originally issue number 31 in the internal issue tracker.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: