Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃帹 Improved search keywords in Admin-X Settings #18608

Merged

Conversation

betschki
Copy link
Contributor

@betschki betschki commented Oct 13, 2023

Got some code for us? Awesome 馃帄!

Please include a description of your change & check your PR against this list, thanks!

  • There's a clear use-case for this code change, explained below
  • Commit message has a short title & references relevant issues
  • The build will pass (run yarn test:all and yarn lint)

We appreciate your contribution!


馃 Generated by Copilot at b1ece9b

Moved and updated the search keywords for the settings sections from their respective component files to the AdvancedSettings.tsx file. This was part of a refactoring to consolidate the settings components and to improve the searchability of the settings options.

no issue

- improves search results in adminx settings
- e.g. when searching for "code injection" no results were returned
- makes sure that all user-facing labels are referenced by the searchKeywords
@binary-koan
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the contribution! I'll take a proper look early next week and double check these all match our intention with search, but this looks great!

@daniellockyer daniellockyer changed the title 馃帹 Improve search keywords in adminx settings 馃帹 Improved search keywords in Admin-X Settings Oct 17, 2023
@daniellockyer daniellockyer merged commit 40a2bda into TryGhost:main Oct 17, 2023
14 checks passed
@daniellockyer
Copy link
Member

Thanks @betschki! 馃檪

@betschki betschki deleted the adminx-setting-search-improvements branch October 19, 2023 14:38
daniellockyer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants