Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates to revisions class #14

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 13, 2019
Merged

Updates to revisions class #14

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 13, 2019

Conversation

bens95
Copy link
Contributor

@bens95 bens95 commented Jun 14, 2018

Fixes issue in #13

Changed is_authorized() so that it returns the correct result
Added tickets field to revision class
Added tickets field to device revisions
fixed is_authorized()
@bens95 bens95 changed the base branch from master to Development June 14, 2018 02:32
pytos/securetrack/xml_objects/rest/device.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pytos/securetrack/xml_objects/rest/device.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pytos/securetrack/xml_objects/rest/device.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pytos/securetrack/xml_objects/rest/device.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bens95
Copy link
Contributor Author

bens95 commented Jun 18, 2018

Does this look good now?

@DeepSpace2 DeepSpace2 merged commit 952e51f into Tufin:Development Nov 13, 2019
DeepSpace2 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2019
- Added tickets attribute to Device_Revision class
- Version bumped to 1.2.3
- closes #13, closes #14
@DeepSpace2
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, better late than never... this is merged into master and is available in version 1.2.3

DeepSpace2 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 14, 2019
* Updates to revisions class (#14)

Added tickets attribute to Device_Revision class

* Device_Revision - Using an empty list as a default value instead of None for tickets attribute, so iteration still works

Version bumped to 1.2.3

* Device_Revision - Fixed a typo in variable name

Version bumped to 1.2.4
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants