Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the documentation (formulation and tutorial/how-to) with the use of a tighter formulation for storage assets #640

Closed
Tracked by #576
datejada opened this issue May 11, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #644
Assignees
Labels
Type: addition Add something that doesn't exist Zone: documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@datejada
Copy link
Member

datejada commented May 11, 2024

Update documentation on early work from Maaike's research to improve energy storage constraints. See attached PDF

SpineOpt-formulation-GM.pdf

@datejada
Copy link
Member Author

datejada commented May 11, 2024

Some initial questions to address with @g-moralesespana:

  • What if we don't have a limit $C, D$ for the investment variables? -> Add a validation, if there is no investment limit, then the user can't use the binary method.
  • We use minimum/maximum profiles instead of $\phi$. So, how does equation $(108)$ change? -> it doesn't change.
  • Can we have only one formulation for with and without storage inflows? -> We won't add the equations with storage.
image

@datejada
Copy link
Member Author

After review with @g-moralesespana we will only implement the following constraints in the model:
(102), (103), (107), (109), (110), (111), (112), (113), (114).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: addition Add something that doesn't exist Zone: documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
1 participant