Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cura slicer shows 190 layers.... klipper/fluidd says its 33250 layers #19589

Closed
soundtechscott opened this issue Aug 27, 2024 · 9 comments
Closed
Labels
Status: Under Investigation The issue has been confirmed or is assumed to be likely to be a real issue. It's pending discussion. Type: Discussion Open-ended discussion (compared to specific question).

Comments

@soundtechscott
Copy link

Cura Version

5.8

Operating System

win 10

Printer

neptune 4 max - custom upgrades - klipper with octopus pro

Reproduction steps

imported some objects into cura
sliced
sent to printer

Actual results

Cura reports 190 layers
but klipper/fluidd says it 33250

Expected results

it should be the same 190 layers in fluidd
works correctly on 5.7
so something with 5.8 slicing is causing it to be read as extra layers in klipper

Add your .zip and screenshots here ⬇️

image
image

@soundtechscott soundtechscott added Status: Triage This ticket requires input from someone of the Cura team Type: Bug The code does not produce the intended behavior. labels Aug 27, 2024
@GregValiant GregValiant added Status: Needs Info Needs more information before action can be taken. and removed Status: Triage This ticket requires input from someone of the Cura team labels Aug 27, 2024
@GregValiant
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the report.
You haven't given us anything to look at or review. We need at least a project file.
You have (what appears to be) a heavily modified 3rd party printer. When you "send to printer" how are you doing that?

@soundtechscott
Copy link
Author

My machine is a Neptune 4... but I have changed it out to an Octopus Pro Board instead of the piece of crap that Elegoo uses
everything else about it is Generic Klipper/Fluidd.. installed from kiauh, updated regularly thru the Fluidd interface

This File should be 33 layers according to Cura, but when you do a G-Code preview in Fluidd, it shows up as over 30k layers

I've Included 2 files that are different than the one pictures so I am not uploading files that I've spent a lot of time custom making
image

image

GCODE end links.zip

CURA end links.zip

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Status: Needs Info Needs more information before action can be taken. label Aug 29, 2024
@GregValiant GregValiant added Type: Discussion Open-ended discussion (compared to specific question). Status: Under Investigation The issue has been confirmed or is assumed to be likely to be a real issue. It's pending discussion. and removed Type: Bug The code does not produce the intended behavior. labels Aug 29, 2024
@GregValiant
Copy link
Collaborator

Line 669 of the gcode file plainly states:
;LAYER_COUNT:33
If the softwares that are down stream are reading it wrong then the problem would seem to be downstream from Cura.

You appear to have the "Elegoo Neptune Thumbnails" post processor running. That is provided with Elegoo Cura and not with UltiMaker Cura. That might be causing a conflict downstream.

I'm going to remove the bug label from this and close it. I just don't see an UltiMaker Cura problem here at all. If you come up with something that actually points at UM Cura this can be re-opened. I hope you understand.

@soundtechscott
Copy link
Author

I am running Ultimaker Cura... with the elegoo thumbnail plugin added...
this is not elegoo cura version
I downloaded 5.8 directly from this github

tonight when I get home from work I can try it with the elegoo plugin removed

@soundtechscott
Copy link
Author

Removing the elegoo plugin didnt make any difference
I also submitted a bug report to Fluidd to see if its on their end

@soundtechscott
Copy link
Author

Cura used to work in fluidd as expected showing layers properly
now it doest...
This is a CURA bug

image

@soundtechscott
Copy link
Author

I'm going toad the recommended fix by the fluidd guys for now...
but It used to work just fine without it in earlier versions of cura

so something has changed or gotten dropped in cura 5.8(that existed in 5.7) and should be corrected to keep current with one of the more popular web/klipper interfaces for 3d printing

@GregValiant
Copy link
Collaborator

Since someone had bothered to write a fix for this problem it would seem that this has been a known problem on the Klipper side.

Klipper is not currently one of the firmware flavors supported by Cura. There is an ongoing project to add Klipper support into Cura, but it a work in process.
It may have worked for you previously, but since the configuration is after Cura has completed the gcode it would be up to the Klipper developers to handle the file that is received.
Your report is the first incidence of this behavior. It would appear that most people are not having this problem as there is a good sized base of people successfully using Cura with Klipper enabled printers.

@soundtechscott
Copy link
Author

soundtechscott commented Aug 30, 2024

or since Cura is the only software that has this problem... its a problem on the CURA Side of things
my version 5.7 works fine, so I guess I'm staying in 5.7 for now
it works fine in orca, Prusa, and in Bambu slicers

Maybe since Klipper is the current most common 3d printer backend to use, maybe cura should start to design with that in mind....
every new 3d printer out comes with klipper now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Under Investigation The issue has been confirmed or is assumed to be likely to be a real issue. It's pending discussion. Type: Discussion Open-ended discussion (compared to specific question).
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants
@soundtechscott @GregValiant and others