Feature/buf protoc to generate #344
Conversation
|
Please stop merging as we have not yet completed testing after code generation. |
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
.github/workflows/cr.yml
Outdated
| LANGUAGE: English | ||
| MODEL: gpt-3.5-turbo | ||
| top_p: 1 | ||
| temperature: 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code defines a GitHub Actions workflow that triggers on Pull Requests that are opened, reopened, or synchronized. The workflow has one job called "code-review", which runs on an Ubuntu Linux environment. The job has one step that uses an external action provided by the anc95/ChatGPT-CodeReview GitHub repository.
The permissions section indicates that the external action requires permission to read the contents of the Pull Request and write to it.
Potential improvement suggestions:
- Add a description for the workflow to provide more context about what the workflow does.
- Provide information on what the "anc95/ChatGPT-CodeReview" action does and how it is used.
- Consider adding test cases to ensure that the workflow is functioning correctly.
- Consider adding error handling mechanisms in case the external action fails or encounters unexpected behavior.
.vscode/launch.json
Outdated
| ], | ||
| "cwd": "${workspaceFolder}", | ||
| "preLaunchTask": "copy_alpha_node_data", | ||
| }, | ||
| ] | ||
| } No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It seems that the code patch is related to Visual Studio Code's launch configurations for Go language. Based on the changes, it appears that the launch configuration is updated to use "./data/test" instead of "./data/test-1" for the home directory for each process.
One improvement suggestion could be to refactor and reduce duplicate code by extracting the common configuration options into a shared object or function instead of repeating them for each process in the configuration file.
As for potential bug risks, we cannot determine without knowing the entire context and purpose of the code.
.vscode/tasks.json
Outdated
| "type": "shell", | ||
| "cwd": "${workspaceFolder}", | ||
| "command": "scripts/utils/get-backup-data.sh", | ||
| }, | ||
| ] | ||
| } No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code patch adds several script commands to a workspace configuration file.
It appears that the new commands ("prepare tx direct", "run pricefeed", and "copy_alpha_node_data") all run shell scripts from specified directories.
Without access to these scripts, it is difficult to assess potential risks in the code. However, it would be beneficial to ensure that the scripts are thoroughly tested and do not pose any security vulnerabilities (e.g., command injection or other exploits).
In terms of improvements, it may be useful to add comments to the configuration file explaining what each command does and why it is necessary. Additionally, considering adding error handling or logging functionality in case any of the commands fail. Finally, make sure there is a newline at the end of the file to help avoid errors when merging with other files.
Makefile
Outdated
| mocks: $(MOCKS_DIR) | ||
| docker run -v "$(CURDIR):/app" -u `stat -c "%u:%g" $(CURDIR)` -w /app ekofr/gomock:go-1.17 /bin/sh scripts/utils/mockgen.sh | ||
| .PHONY: mocks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code patch adds a target for running unit tests on specific packages, specified with variable NAMES. It also modifies the existing test-unit target to run all unit tests and renames it to test-unit-all. The proto-gen target now also runs gen-swagger.sh. Finally, the patch adds a new target, mocks, for generating the mock files.
There do not appear to be any immediate bug risks in this code patch, but some suggestions for improvement are:
- Adding comments above each target to explain its purpose would make the Makefile more readable and easier to understand.
- Adding a dependency from the new test-unit-% targets to the mocks target would ensure that the mock source code is always up to date before running tests.
- Adding a linting target would help ensure code quality and consistency.
README.md
Outdated
| @@ -197,9 +200,6 @@ May 16 17:57:26 cosmovisor[232029]: 5:57PM INF Starting pprof server laddr=local | |||
|
|
|||
| ## License | |||
|
|
|||
| Forked from [Kava](github.com/Kava-Labs/kava). | |||
| Thanks Kava Team. | |||
|
|
|||
| Copyright © UnUniFi development team. All rights reserved. | |||
|
|
|||
| Licensed under the [Apache v2 License](LICENSE.md). | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the code patch, there is a version update of Go from 17.x to 18.x, and its installation steps included. The bashrc file is being updated by adding the path to Go's bin directory to the PATH environment variable.
In addition, the repository for UnUniFi blockchain is being cloned, checked out to v1.0.0 branch, and built with 'make install' command.
The code review suggests that the code looks good, and there are no apparent bug risks. However, there are some improvement suggestions:
- Error handling could be added for each command, ensuring they execute as expected.
- Security consideration such as running unverified commands like
rm -rfshould be reviewed carefully. - It would be useful to add more specific comments to the code to increase its readability.
- The license text could be shortened for improved clarity.
Regarding the licensing part, it was mentioned that it has been forked from Kava-Labs/kava, and thanks were given to their team. Still, the license text for UnUniFi development team rights reserved and Apache v2 License is stated, so it is essential to ensure that the necessary requirements of both licenses are being met.
RELEASES.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| ## Syncing from genesis | ||
|
|
||
| The team will be putting together instructions that will be kept up-to-date for syncing without using a backup. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall, the code patch provides clear and concrete guidelines for release and upgrade procedures and communications. Some suggested improvements are:
- Define what constitutes "active validators" explicitly.
- Clarify the criteria for determining when there is no alternative to a 48-72 hour notice period.
- Define the process for ensuring that the procedures are up-to-date when changes occur.
- Consider adding instructions or guidelines for what should be included in a governance proposal.
- Clarify what happens if the target upgrade block is missed.
- Consider adding guidelines for handling any issues or problems that arise during the upgrade process.
In terms of bug risks, the code patch does not inherently contain any code, so there is no risk of bugs. However, the implementation of the procedures outlined may have potential bugs or issues that could arise during the upgrade process. These can be minimized by testing the upgrade process thoroughly before deployment and having contingency plans in place in case anything goes wrong.
app/ante/signdoc.pb.go
Outdated
| _ "github.com/gogo/protobuf/gogoproto" | ||
| proto "github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto" | ||
| _ "google.golang.org/protobuf/types/known/timestamppb" | ||
| io "io" | ||
| math "math" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on the provided code patch, it looks like the following changes were made:
- An import was added for
github.com/cosmos/gogoproto/proto. - An import was removed for
github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto.
Given just this code patch, it is difficult to determine if there are any bug risks or improvement suggestions. Other parts of the code not included here would need to be reviewed as well.
app/ante/sigverify.go
Outdated
| @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ import ( | |||
| "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/x/auth/migrations/legacytx" | |||
| authsigning "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/x/auth/signing" | |||
| "github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/x/auth/types" | |||
| "github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto" | |||
| proto "github.com/cosmos/gogoproto/proto" | |||
|
|
|||
| "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/accounts" | |||
| "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/crypto" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code patch seems to just be an import change. The import of proto has been updated from "github.com/gogo/protobuf/proto" to "github.com/cosmos/gogoproto/proto". This change is unlikely to introduce any bugs, it's simply swapping out one protocol buffer library for another. One possible improvement suggestion would be to ensure that all dependencies are pinned to specific versions to avoid unexpected updates in the future.
app/upgrades/README.md
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| # UnUniFi Upgrades | |||
|
|
|||
| - v1-beta.3 - Token distribution in upgrade | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on the code patch provided, there is not enough information to determine if there are any bugs or risks. However, it appears that a new version of UnUniFi (v1-beta.3) has been released and includes an upgrade to token distribution. It would be beneficial to review the code changes associated with this upgrade to ensure that they are implemented correctly and do not introduce any new bugs or vulnerabilities.
Improvement suggestions could include adding more detailed information about the specific changes made and potentially providing additional documentation or testing to ensure the functionality is working as intended.
app/upgrades/v1-beta.3/constants.go
Outdated
| type SpecialBankSendTarget struct { | ||
| FromAddress string `json:"fromAddress,omitempty"` | ||
| BankSendTarget BankSendTarget `json:"bankSendTarget,omitempty"` | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code adds a new file to package v1_beta3 containing constants, types, and structs used in an application. It seems like a configuration file with hard-coded values. There are no functions defined in the code.
Here are some suggestions for improvement:
- Instead of using hard-coded values, make use of environmental variables or YAML configurations.
- Add proper error handling in code if required.
- Provide comments on exported structures and variables.
- If the constants provided in the patch represent part of a larger system, it could be helpful to see how they fit into that system.
I do not see any apparent bug risk in this code.
app/upgrades/v1-beta.3/upgrades.go
Outdated
|
|
||
| return mm.RunMigrations(ctx, configurator, vm) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code defines the function CreateUpgradeHandler that creates an upgrade handler for a Cosmos SDK v1_beta3 module.
The function takes in several parameters including a module.Manager, a module.Configurator, an authkeeper.AccountKeeper, and a bankkeeper.Keeper. It returns an upgradetypes.UpgradeHandler function.
The function first logs info about the start of the update, then enables default send in the BankParams, calls the BankSendList function and upgrades the bank send accordingly. The function then disables default send in the BankParams and returns the results of running migrations using the module.Manager.
A bug risk in this code may be the use of the panic function to handle errors. Instead, it is recommended to use proper error handling procedures. Additionally, it is not clear from the code snippet what the BankSendList function does, so it is difficult to determine what this code is doing exactly without seeing its implementation. The logging statements can also be consolidated to avoid redundancy.
As for improvement suggestions, it may be helpful to add more comments explaining the code's purpose and how it works. Breaking down the logic into smaller functions with specific purposes could also increase the code's readability and improve maintainability.
cmd/ununifid/main.go
Outdated
| @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ import ( | |||
|
|
|||
| func main() { | |||
| rootCmd, _ := cmd.NewRootCmd() | |||
|
|
|||
| if err := svrcmd.Execute(rootCmd, "", app.DefaultNodeHome); err != nil { | |||
| switch e := err.(type) { | |||
| case server.ErrorCode: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on the presented patch, I don't see any major bug risks. However, there is one improvement suggestion:
- It's better to handle the error that is returned by
cmd.NewRootCmd()function instead of using_to discard the error. This will make it easier to identify and resolve any issues with creating the root command.
Other than this, everything looks fine.
| \end{cases} | ||
| $$ | ||
|
|
||
| ※If all bidders do not exercise their winning bid rights, all forfeited deposits will become protocol proceeds No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall, the code patch seems to be describing a Collateral Liquidation Deposit Auction system where bidders can deposit their assets as collateral and borrow an amount of money against it. Here are some feedback and suggestions for improvement:
-
The code patch lacks actual code implementation, so it's hard to assess its functionality or identify potential bugs.
-
It would benefit from more detailed explanations, such as the purpose of each state transition, how to calculate the interest rate, and what happens during a liquidation event.
-
The comments within the code patch are helpful, but they may require further elaboration to aid better understanding.
-
The user interface guidelines provide clear instructions for visual representations of the deposited and borrowed amounts over time.
-
The settlement with exhibitor's decision and liquidation procedures are well-defined and appear to ensure fairness in the event of non-compliance.
-
The formula to calculate the interest distribution upon liquidation seems reasonable but could benefit from additional explanation or examples.
In summary, the code patch describes a system that can be useful for conducting Collateral Liquidation Deposit Auctions, but some improvements and clarifications could make it easier to understand and implement.
| 1. NFTを出品できる | ||
| 1. NFTを落札できる | ||
| 1. NFTに入札があった場合に出品者はステーブルトークンを発行できる | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code patch provided is written in a mix of English and Japanese, making it difficult to fully understand the implementation details. However, based on the provided information, it appears that the module being implemented allows for the minting of stablecoins using an NFT as collateral.
There are no specific code snippets included in the patch to review for bugs or improvement suggestions. Therefore, I cannot provide any specific feedback on the code itself.
As a general suggestion, it would be helpful to include more detailed information about the implementation, such as technology stack, libraries used, data structures, and algorithms employed. Additionally, the code should be properly documented with clear comments explaining the purpose and functionality of each method or function.
docs/client/config.json
Outdated
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code appears to be a JSON file containing a list of objects that map URLs to operation IDs. Each object includes a "rename" key which maps the original name of "Params" to a new name.
There are no obvious bug risks in this code as it is just configuration data. However, there may be issues if an incorrect URL or operation ID is used.
One improvement suggestion would be to provide more context or documentation for the purpose of each URL and operation ID, so that it is easier to understand the intended functionality. Additionally, adding comments to the code can help others who may need to edit or maintain it in the future.
docs/devtools/Makefile
Outdated
| protoc-gen-doc: | ||
| @echo "Installing protoc-gen-gen..." | ||
| @go get github.com/pseudomuto/protoc-gen-doc/cmd/protoc-gen-doc | ||
| @go install github.com/pseudomuto/protoc-gen-doc/cmd/protoc-gen-doc | ||
|
|
||
| buf: protoc-gen-buf-check-breaking protoc-gen-buf-check-lint | ||
| @echo "Installing buf..." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code patch appears to be making changes to the version numbers used for BUF and Protoc. It also adds the protoc-gen-grpc target to install additional packages related to gRPC gateway support.
There don't seem to be any obvious bug risks in the code. As for possible improvements, it might be worth adding error-checking and logging messages to indicate whether the various installation steps have succeeded or failed. Additionally, standardizing indentation may increase code readability.
docs/devtools/for_build.go
Outdated
| _ "github.com/regen-network/cosmos-proto/protoc-gen-gocosmos" | ||
| _ "google.golang.org/grpc/cmd/protoc-gen-go-grpc" | ||
| _ "google.golang.org/protobuf/cmd/protoc-gen-go" | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code patch seems to be adding a package for tool dependencies in a Go module. The //go:build tools directive indicates that the code in this file is only built when running go build on the tools tag.
The import statements are importing several external packages, which are likely being used as plugins for the protoc tool (Protocol Buffer compiler). It's good that these dependencies are included as part of the module so that anyone who wants to use this project can easily get the necessary tools.
Overall, there doesn't seem to be any obvious bug risks or improvements to suggest just based on this code patch alone. However, it would be helpful to see the other parts of the codebase using these tool dependencies to make sure they are being used correctly and efficiently.
networks/README.md
Outdated
| @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ | |||
| # UnUniFi Networks | |||
|
|
|||
| This repo contains documents for the network updates. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code patch you provided doesn't contain any actual code, but rather a text file describing the contents of a repository. From what I can see, there do not appear to be any bugs or improvements that need to be made based on this information alone. However, it is important to ensure that the repository actually contains the necessary documents and that they are kept up-to-date for any network changes. Additionally, including more detailed information in the readme (such as installation or usage instructions) may improve the usability of the repository.
|
|
||
| ## Futher Help | ||
|
|
||
| If you need more help, please go to our discord https://discord.gg/GXTx9wjA. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overall, the code patch seems clear and well-structured. Here are some suggestions for improvement:
-
It's a good practice to provide more background information on what UnUniFi is, why the upgrade is necessary, and what changes users can expect after the upgrade.
-
The instructions assume that readers are familiar with Go, cosmovisor, and command line interfaces. Additional details or references would be helpful for less experienced readers.
-
In the Setup section, adding a step to verify the SHA256 checksum of the binary before copying it to the appropriate folder could increase security.
-
Providing more context around potential risks or issues that could arise during the upgrade process would be beneficial for validators or other stakeholders who may be concerned about data loss, downtime, or other factors.
-
Finally, it would be good to include instructions on how to roll back the upgrade if something goes wrong during the process, as this can help users feel more confident in carrying out the upgrade.
| // kind in case the signer information is contained within | ||
| // a message inside the cosmos message. | ||
| repeated string signer = 11110000; | ||
| } No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This code patch seems to be defining protocol buffer message options and service options for a Cosmos SDK project.
Some possible improvement suggestions:
- Add comments to explain the purpose of the new options and the reasons behind using specific values (like 11110000).
- Consider adding more details to the go_package option comment, such as explaining why it needs to be updated once the migration to protov2 is complete.
- Check if there are any existing conventions or guidelines within the Cosmos SDK project regarding option numbering and naming, and follow them if applicable.
As for bug risks, it's hard to tell without seeing how this code will be used and integrated into the larger system.
…f_protoc_to_generate
proto/auction/auction.proto
Outdated
| @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import "google/protobuf/timestamp.proto"; | |||
| import "google/protobuf/duration.proto"; | |||
| import "cosmos/base/v1beta1/coin.proto"; | |||
|
|
|||
| option go_package = "github.com/UnUniFi/chain/x/auction/types"; | |||
| option go_package = "github.com/UnUniFi/chain/x/deprecated/auction/types"; | |||
|
|
|||
| message BaseAuction { | |||
| uint64 id = 1 [(gogoproto.moretags) = "yaml:\"id\""]; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The code patch looks like a simple modification of the protocol buffer file, changing the Go package import path from "github.com/UnUniFi/chain/x/auction/types" to "github.com/UnUniFi/chain/x/deprecated/auction/types".
There is no apparent bug risk in this modification since it only affects the import path. However, it's possible that other parts of the codebase are still using the old import path. Therefore, a search for usages of the old import path may be necessary to ensure that everything has been updated.
A small improvement suggestion would be to add comments to indicate why this change was made and who made it. This can help future developers understand the code better.
|
The proto-gen result using the script is in correct and I think we won’t be able to use it. |
#224