Difference between Global and Average results for Reverberation Time #358
Unanswered
user11042023
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
Hi,
You can't compute from this table the global level because you need the energetic Sum of frequencies over time, then compute the Global Sound level decrease of sound level in order to compute the global reverberation time. https://i-simpa-wiki.readthedocs.io/fr/latest/room_acoustics_parameters.html#reverberation-time-t
The global RT is the value you have to use. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Thanks a lot for your answer. Just to understand, if the global RT is the important value, what is the meaning of calculating the average of RT value? Thanks again. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi to everyone,
I have some doubts about the Global and Average results calculated for the RT.
I noticed that calculating the RT value in the acoustics parameters, it gives two different values: the global and the average.
While the average is simply the linear average of all the RT corresponding to each frequency, I couldn't find any specific formula corresponding to the result of the global value. I noticed that the global is always higher than the average RT value, and while the average doesn't correspond to any plane receiver map, the global value is often corresponding to that map.
The only thing that I found is that the manual mentions two kinds of averages: the linear (useful for: G, T, EDT, C, D, ts, LF, LFC) and the energetic (useful for LJ).
My questions about the global RT value are:
Thanks a lot for your time
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions