New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

true asset reproducibility #6

illwieckz opened this Issue Dec 11, 2018 · 0 comments


None yet
1 participant
Copy link

illwieckz commented Dec 11, 2018

Issue #2 tracked the effort to allow anyone to rebuild assets in the way they get something with the very same quality and level of completeness… but produced file are not truly reproducible bit to bit.

This is a (growing) list of things to fix in order to produce bit-to-bit reproducibility:

  • q3map2 build comment in bsp file (it's a job for q3map2);
  • file timestamp in zip archive (it's a job for Urcheon);
  • zip compression using 7z in Urcheon (currently we recompress after build to get smaller file size than Python's zipfile produces);
  • standardized way to include nexe in unvanquished dpk;
  • nexe reproducibility for unvanquished dpk, what's the status on it? It's well known cmake is not good for reproducibility.

@illwieckz illwieckz referenced this issue Dec 11, 2018


map build somewhat reproducibility #2

11 of 11 tasks complete
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment