Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider Static Site Generator #69

Closed
cy-by opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider Static Site Generator #69

cy-by opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@cy-by
Copy link
Collaborator

cy-by commented Apr 18, 2018

Summary

Should we move this site to a static site generator?

Review all the options

If we go the route of using a static generator, there are a ton of great options. I'm going to list a few that I use and love:

I personally love Vue.js. Gatsby is fun to work with. I've created many Jekyll sites, but the industry is very slowly moving away from it (at least it's not in the bleeding edge anymore).

Reasons to keep it simple

There is an argument to not move this site into a static site generator. It would take some time to make and add some more overhead and assumed knowledge for people to help maintain it.

As Tom suggested, It would be possible to write simple vanilla JavaScript to scrape a .json file and add the content to the "Archive" page. We would have to write out documentation on the proper way to add the json, so that anyone could create a ticket or some process to easily update.

Let's discuss

@cy-by
Copy link
Collaborator Author

cy-by commented Jun 9, 2019

Won't do for now

@cy-by cy-by closed this as completed Jun 9, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant