Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change WebSphere Liberty images from UBI 8 to 9 #483

Open
leochr opened this issue Dec 5, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Change WebSphere Liberty images from UBI 8 to 9 #483

leochr opened this issue Dec 5, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@leochr
Copy link
Member

leochr commented Dec 5, 2022

Existing UBI images for Liberty are based on UBI 8. Update the images to use UBI 9. But consider any breaking change/implication with moving the UBI version up.

Semeru images based on UBI 9 are already available in icr.io. Check up on IBM Java image.

@leochr
Copy link
Member Author

leochr commented Aug 2, 2023

UBI 8 will be in support at least until 2029 (according to the information in https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata#RHEL8_Life_Cycle). Some OS CVEs are only fixed for UBI 9 and not UBI 8 (it's marked as 'Will not fix' in Red Hat's CVE bulletin). Given these, the plan is to change Liberty images from UBI 8 to UBI 9. To minimize disruption, this change will be done in a non-quarterly driver 23.0.0.10. At that time, images for 23.0.0.6 and 23.0.0.9 would still be supported and would remain with UBI 8. This will provide customers that need to stay on a supported Liberty quarterly release images that's based on UBI 8 until the release of 24.0.0.6 (8 months).

@leochr leochr changed the title UBI 9 based WebSphere Liberty images Change WebSphere Liberty images from UBI 8 to 9 Aug 2, 2023
@tjwatson
Copy link
Member

tjwatson commented Aug 2, 2023

Given these, the plan is to change Liberty images from UBI 8 to UBI 9. To minimize disruption, this change will be done in a non-quarterly driver 23.0.0.10.

We need to add an issue to the Open-Liberty planning to support InstantOn with UBI 9 very soon then. We have not investigated UBI 9 for many months but last time we did there were some challenges that we needed to overcome.

@vijaysun-omr
Copy link

There may be additional challenges with respect to supporting InstantOn on Power and Z with UBI9. I think we need more time (at least for those platforms and perhaps even for X86) from an InstantOn perspective.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants