Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FR - Read annovar database names from config.ini #15

Open
rjsicko opened this issue May 4, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

FR - Read annovar database names from config.ini #15

rjsicko opened this issue May 4, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@rjsicko
Copy link

rjsicko commented May 4, 2017

Hi, thanks for the great program!
It would be great if the database_names for annovar were read from the config.ini file instead of hard-coded into Intervar.py. This would allow use of the updated databases avsnp147, dbnsfp33a, clinvar_20170130 and incorporation of gnomad_exome, mcap, revel.

@kaichop
Copy link
Contributor

kaichop commented May 5, 2017 via email

@drmurdock
Copy link

Has this been implemented yet? I may be wrong but It still appears that databases are hard coded into Intervar.py.

@quanliustc
Copy link
Collaborator

quanliustc commented Jan 25, 2018 via email

@drmurdock
Copy link

Thanks! Hopefully there will be an updated version at some point that allows other databases to be used.

@vnttung
Copy link

vnttung commented Apr 11, 2019

The user directly change the database name will bring some problem. I don’t suggest the user direct change the dataset name to update. Because some intervar pre-built database is more sensitive to some databases, such as clinvar. What I mean is: the version of intervar prebuilt dataset should come with the same version of outside dataset.

Is dbnsfp33a sensitive to change, ANNOVAR has released the 35a version, which I notice two have 4 more extra columns (not documented on their website tho)? Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants