Proposal: pick dashed-names instead of DashedNames for new repos

[foolip]

In biblio.json there are 3 things using CamelCase:

• https://wicg.github.io/InputDeviceCapabilities/
• https://wicg.github.io/ResizeObserver/
• https://wicg.github.io/BackgroundSync/spec/

Also WICG-originating, I think:

• https://w3c.github.io/IntersectionObserver/
• https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/

People don't seem to want to use the CamelCase names in web-platform-tests, see resize-observer, intersection-observer and service-workers: https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests

It would be less work for me matching up specs and tests in https://foolip.github.io/day-to-day/ if WICG repos tended to start out at dashed-names :)

[anssiko]

Also W3C TR shortnames tend to be dashed-names, making for a better migration story if we stick with that convention for WICG repos too.

[marcoscaceres]

Agree. We should do this going forward. I'll update the wiki.

[marcoscaceres]

@cwilso, @yoavweiss ^^^ please note the new naming policy. I've added that check as part of the transfer process.

https://github.com/WICG/admin/wiki/Process-to-transfer-a-repo