Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TC39 is also open to this proposal as part of JS #54

Closed
littledan opened this issue Sep 2, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

TC39 is also open to this proposal as part of JS #54

littledan opened this issue Sep 2, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@littledan
Copy link

No action required, I just want to note that this proposal meets the two requests that were made in TC39 that I was aware of:

  • @domenic asked that observables tie into a unified concept of cancellation. This proposal meets that with AbortSignal integration.
  • I asked that this proposal be based on explicit cooperation with DOM/HTML folks, that it not be done by TC39 in a vacuum. This is resolved here, by the explicit integration proposed in this repository. (I was also concerned about the intelligibility of the programming model, which we can discuss in another issue.)

Historically, the proposal was held back in TC39 because no one presented a version which solved both issues--no one put the proposal on the TC39 agenda since 2016. As with cancellation, TC39 did not reject this proposal or deem it out of scope. Anyway, at this point, I'm happy with this proposal proceeding in whichever venue is most convenient for proponents, now that we have WinterCG to bridge the gap between other runtime environments, and an improved culture on all sides of taking more stakeholders' concerns into account.

@domfarolino domfarolino pinned this issue Apr 3, 2024
@littledan littledan changed the title Thanks for resolving past issues raised in TC39 TC39 is also open to this proposal as part of JS Apr 9, 2024
@domfarolino
Copy link
Collaborator

I think this issue is a great note — and thank you for filing it. At this point though, I think it can probably be closed. See also the discussion going on in w3ctag/design-reviews#902 about standards venue. I think we are happy with the proposal proceeding along the current path.

@domfarolino domfarolino unpinned this issue Aug 13, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants