You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should there be an upper limit for the length of the impulse response buffer? If a huge buffer is used this could easily completely destroy performance. If there are no practical uses for convolution over a certain size, we could just limit it and avoid different implementations having different internal limits and having to reverse engineer the competition to figure out what the Web-compatible limits are.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Audio-ISSUE-73 (ConvolverNodeLimits): ConvolverNode buffer size limits [Web Audio API]
http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/track/issues/73
Raised by: Philip Jägenstedt
On product: Web Audio API
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html#ConvolverNode
Should there be an upper limit for the length of the impulse response buffer? If a huge buffer is used this could easily completely destroy performance. If there are no practical uses for convolution over a certain size, we could just limit it and avoid different implementations having different internal limits and having to reverse engineer the competition to figure out what the Web-compatible limits are.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: