-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EagleC HiChIP with Neoloopfinder #21
Comments
Hi, sorry for the late response. You may run "assemble-complexSVs" and "neoloop-caller" on your HiChIP data as if it is a Hi-C data by specifying "--balance-type ICE" in your commands. However, applying ICE to HiChIP may eliminate meaningful interactions and induce fake interactions. But I do have a plan this year to release a new version that considers HiChIP's own features. I will keep you posted when it is done. Best, |
Thanks, I will try that. But just to make sure I understand correctly, when using ICE normalized mcools I would skip the calculate-cnv, segment-cnvs and correct-cnvs steps and directly use the assemble-cnv command on my data, right? |
Yes, if you are going to use ICE-normalized values to identify neo-loops, you can skip them. |
Thanks |
Hello,
More a question than an issue. I have used EagleC to predict SVs in my HiChIP data and converted it to NeoLoopFinder format. I was wondering if I can use this as input to NeoLoopFinder or not? I know EagleC supports HiChIP data but not sure if NeoLoopFinder does?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: