Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Help Interpreting Results for Structural Variations #39

Open
qolba opened this issue Aug 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Help Interpreting Results for Structural Variations #39

qolba opened this issue Aug 8, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@qolba
Copy link

qolba commented Aug 8, 2024

Hi,

I’ve been using EagleC to analyze HiC data, and I’ve encountered some results that I’m having trouble interpreting. The output looks like this:

chrom1 pos1 chrom2 pos2 ++ +- -+ --
chr10 3150000 chr10 4800000 2.543e-18 1.478e-14 0.8158 1.85e-20
chr18 42200000 chr18 43800000 1.738e-11 6.265e-12 0.9564 1.28e-09
chr21 24500000 chr21 30650000 3.837e-08 0.8111 1.423e-08 1.402e-07

I’ve visualized the reported regions, and they seem to show some form of structural rearrangement, but I’m not sure how to distinguish between different types of events like deletion, duplication, insertion, or inversion based on these results.

Could you please explain how to interpret the ++, +-, -+, and -- columns? How do these values relate to different types of structural variants?

Thank you for your help!

N268_50kb_chr10_3150000_4800000
N268_50kb_chr18_42200000_43800000

@XiaoTaoWang
Copy link
Owner

Hi, the values in these columns represent the probability scores indicating the likelihood that a predicted SV belongs to a specific fusion type ("++", "+-", "-+", and "--"). Specifically, if an SV has high scores for both "++" and "--", or for both "+-" and "-+", it can be interpreted as a reciprocal translocation it the fusion occurs between two chromosomes. Similarly, an inversion is expected to have high scores for both the "++" and "--" fusion types.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants