Fixing XRT issue for Ubuntu 23.10

[haghilin]

Problem solved by the commit:
There was compilation issues on Ubuntu 23.10 which was reported in issue #7806.

Bug / issue (if any) fixed, which PR introduced the bug, how it was discovered
issue #7806

How problem was solved, alternative solutions (if any) and why they were rejected
Risks (if any) associated the changes in the commit
What has been tested and how, request additional testing if necessary

[haghilin]

Hi @keryell,
Thanks for the comment. I could also replicate the issue during the test on my side. We will work on fixing "dpkg-shlibdeps: error". I guess at the moment build is fine.

Thanks for reporting the issue

[gbuildx]

Build failed :(

[haghilin]

retest this please!

[stsoe]

Thank you!

[gbuildx]

Build failed :(

[keryell]

Thanks. The compilation is good now.
Just remaining #7806 (comment)

[haghilin]

retest this please!

[gbuildx]

Build failed :(

[stsoe]

retest this please

[gbuildx]

Build failed :(

[haghilin]

retest this please

[keryell]

I have just tried and I still have

CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-3.27/Modules/Internal/CPack/CPackDeb.cmake:348 (message):
  CPackDeb: dpkg-shlibdeps: 'dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information
  found for opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/libxdp_core.so.2 (used by
  ./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_hw_emu_pl_deadlock_plugin.so)

  Hint: check if the library actually comes from a package.

  ';

  executed command: '/usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps -O
  ./opt/xilinx/xrt/bin/mpd;./opt/xilinx/xrt/bin/msd;./opt/xilinx/xrt/bin/unwrapped/xbmgmt2;./opt/xilinx/xrt/bin/unwrapped/xbutil2;./opt/xilinx/xrt/bin/unwrapped/xclbinutil;./opt/xilinx/xrt/bin/xbflash.qspi;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/libsched_em.so.2.17.0;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/libsched_em_v30.so.2.17.0;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/libxdp_core.so.2.17.0;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/libxilinxopencl.so.2.17.0;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/libxma2api.so.2.17.0;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/libxma2plugin.so.2.17.0;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/libxrt++.so.2.17.0;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/libxrt_core.so.2.17.0;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/libxrt_coreutil.so.2.17.0;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/libxrt_hwemu.so.2.17.0;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/libxrt_noop.so.2.17.0;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/libxrt_swemu.so.2.17.0;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_aie_profile_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_aie_trace_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_appdebug_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_debug_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_device_offload_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_hal_api_interface_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_hal_device_offload_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_hal_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_hw_emu_device_offload_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_hw_emu_pl_deadlock_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_lop_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_native_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_noc_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_opencl_counters_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_opencl_trace_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_pl_deadlock_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_power_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_system_compiler_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_user_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/lib/xrt/module/libxdp_vart_plugin.so;./opt/xilinx/xrt/python/pyxrt.cpython-311-x86_64-linux-gnu.so';

@mamin506 suggested me it might be in @jvillarre backyard.

[gbuildx]

Build failed :(

[dayeh-xilinx]

retest this please

[gbuildx]

Build failed :(

[gbuildx]

Build Passed!

[dirksavage88]

Could this fix be backported to 2022.x?

[keryell]

Could this fix be backported to 2022.x?

@dirksavage88 You would probably need some other PRs too.
Is there an issue about using the latest XRT?

[dirksavage88]

@keryell not the latest XRT, but 2022.1/2022.2 when using ubuntu 22.04 (which should be supported?) on kernel 6.5. Please see the full debug output attachment here: #8093

The original issue with ubuntu 23.10 resulted in a build fail during xocl. I am experiencing a similar build fail but it occurs randomly in the build process.

[keryell]

I was unclear. My question is : does the latest XRT from master branch works for you?
It should work up to 6.8 kernel. I run Ubuntu 23.10 and Linux 6.8.7.
Do you really need an obsolete XRT for some reason?

[dirksavage88]

master fails with this error:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ludev: No such file or directory collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [runtime_src/core/pcie/tools/cloud-daemon/CMakeFiles/mpd.dir/build.make:148: runtime_src/core/pcie/tools/cloud-daemon/mpd] Error 1 make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:2591: runtime_src/core/pcie/tools/cloud-daemon/CMakeFiles/mpd.dir/all] Error 2 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

I am following the docs that say to use XRT version that matches the Vitis version (of which I am using Vitis 2022.1)

[keryell]

Usually recent XRT works with older Vitis. But you could give a try to Vitis 2023.2. :-)
https://github.com/Xilinx/XRT/blob/master/src/runtime_src/doc/toc/build.rst mentions https://github.com/Xilinx/XRT/blob/master/src/runtime_src/tools/scripts/xrtdeps.sh which installs a lot of requirement, including the libudev-dev package which seems to be missing on your system.