We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Continue to experiment with Baobab. Facets look great. One little question / proposal:
Current syntax:
cursors: { url: ["url"], models: ["robots", "models"], }, get: function(data) { let {url, models} = data; ... }
Subjectively cleaner alternative:
cursors: [ ["url"], ["robots", "models"], ], get: function(url, models) { ... }
Keys removed, destructuring is lifted to function signature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
👍
Sorry, something went wrong.
Why not? This wouldn't be incompatible with the current implementation. Let me thinks about it a bit more and take a decision.
Shorthand implemented in v2.
No branches or pull requests
Continue to experiment with Baobab. Facets look great. One little question / proposal:
Current syntax:
Subjectively cleaner alternative:
Keys removed, destructuring is lifted to function signature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: