-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Creation of duplicate nodes #605
Comments
Slightly worrying: this is definitely a problem: this travel agency has been added at least 4 times... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11016233705 |
Perhaps this is a faulty one #540 I see in https://osmcha.org/changesets/138511312 objects created on 2023-03-23. upd: even there is 2022-11-21 Try clearing downloaded objects in the settings. Fix #540 It was a month ago |
|
created_by... Vespucci 19.0.3.0 ? |
Ups, I was totally sure I used EveryDoor |
@deevroman I have cleared the downloaded objects and the cache; but in the settings it still displayed an uploading queue with a lot of old edits I had made. If this problem is solved, it may still be a good idea to let people know it may happen and to clear the upload queue after updating to #540. |
This is interesting. So you sent edits, but they still weren't all sent? If so, it looks like a new problem |
The edits had all been sent already; among the things left to upload were the waste basket and the travel agency I previously mentioned. |
Could you provide a log from menu / I guess it might prove informative |
As far as I can see, no duplicate nodes have been created since I cleared the upload queue. I am thus unable to reproduce the problem anymore. |
Can confirm. I mapped from a fresh slate, deleted downloaded data beforehand. I added some POIs earlier today, uploaded. Went out tonight, mapped new things, uploaded, then noticed duplicates of all the things I had mapped earlier. Now I check the upload queue, and there are things in there from two weeks ago saying Pending. I checked it, and there are three of it now (since deleted). I did use the app to delete the duplicates, and it seems to have successfully done that and removed them from the queue, but it looks like new additions stick around. |
@pkoby Are you able to submit a log reproducing the error before clearing the upload queue? I am unfortunately unable to reproduce the problem. |
Oops, I already cleared the queue. I have been trying to duplicate the issue, or at least I'm keeping track of what things I'm doing in the app to try to troubleshoot if it happens again, but so far no luck(?). So far, events that haven't triggered it are:
|
Thanks for investigating this, guys. I've added a "help wanted" label so people could notice this issue and maybe look for duplicates themselves. |
I think I have a lead. Let's start with @pkoby's edits It can be seen that the edits resulted from a mechanism for splitting large edits into parts. It seems to be a matter of splitting edits here too, but there's more weirdness: If it’s clear from the last empty edit: the connection is probably broken, then where the edits come from without comments is unclear What can be done:
|
As a note, I remember that sometimes I would open the app and it would tell me there were changes to upload before I made any change. |
It looks like the problem is different: https://t.me/everydoor_ru/5383
It seems that when deleting points contained in other lines, the edit packet remains unsent. However, I was not able to reproduce this. The splitting of the edit packages seems to be due to the fact that one of the edits was deleting objects. By the way, in this case there are also empty edits |
perhaps user can be instructed to gather logs? |
one more case: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/144179402 (duplicated these rock and clock, heh) |
I don't know exactly what goes on with it, but it appears to create duplicate nodes at times.
Look at these two changesets: in the second one, several months afterwards, the waste basket was added again in the same spot; and I did not do it. 129200972, 138303681
Same happened with this: 138293099, 138303681
I would never have realized if it was not for this osmose correction: 138497435
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: