We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We should revisit the record ID system and see if we can provide a better way to get record type from the system alongside the actual identifier.
Currently we merge the record type and identifier into a singular identifier for pushing to CloudKit.
We could look to keep a local mapping of identifier to record type in GRDB, or continue with the current system with some improvements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
We should revisit the record ID system and see if we can provide a better way to get record type from the system alongside the actual identifier.
Currently we merge the record type and identifier into a singular identifier for pushing to CloudKit.
We could look to keep a local mapping of identifier to record type in GRDB, or continue with the current system with some improvements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: