You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am the Debian developer currently working on the packaging of SPAdes 4.0.0. It turns out the LICENSE file places the software under GPL-2, but some files are under GPL-3+, for instance src/common/io/graph/gfa.cpp.
As is, the software licenses are incompatible. One solution would be to license SPAdes under GPL-2+ (version 2 or later).
Also some files are under Apache-2.0, which is incompatible with GPL-2.
Unfortunately, we cannot change the license of SPAdes as SPAdes team does not hold copyright on the code. We are not lawyers as well, so we cannot speak about GPLv2 vs Apache 2.0 compatibilities. I know that different IP lawyers and different jurisdictions have different opinions on this matter as well (and the only reason I used to propose one of LLVM exceptions to Apache 2.0 license is to avoid these debates).
As for GPLv3+ for some files, we will check what could be done here.
Description of bug
Hello,
I am the Debian developer currently working on the packaging of SPAdes 4.0.0. It turns out the LICENSE file places the software under GPL-2, but some files are under GPL-3+, for instance src/common/io/graph/gfa.cpp.
As is, the software licenses are incompatible. One solution would be to license SPAdes under GPL-2+ (version 2 or later).
Also some files are under Apache-2.0, which is incompatible with GPL-2.
For further reference on the matter:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-compatibility.html
Happy to help if I can,
Thanks for providing SPAdes!
Pierre
spades.log
No log
params.txt
No params
SPAdes version
SPAdes 4.0.0
Operating System
Debian
Python Version
No response
Method of SPAdes installation
source
No errors reported in spades.log
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: