feat: each pair of namespace-resource will be a buffer

[TxGVNN]

Hi @abrochard,

Come back by few months, I have an KISS idea to resolve #96.
And I added kubel-switch-to-buffer to display only kubel buffers and switch from here.

By using local-var we can separate buffers for each pair of namespace-resouce. Perhaps we can consider context too.

So funny when creating this PR, I was looking back #57. Hi @d1egoaz, we have the same idea. But when I run on your code, it throws error so I can not test it.
If you have time, could you rebase on your PR, and we can contribute together to make it best. Because I'm not sure my PR is better than yours. What is your thought?

[TxGVNN]

Updated:
s/define-transient-command/transient-define-prefix/ on #57, seems it works. Let me have a test

[d1egoaz]

I've been very busy since last year and couldn't keep up with trying to contribute my fork.

This is my current fork, which I use every single day to connect to dozens of context/namespaces/resources at the same time: https://github.com/d1egoaz/kubel/tree/diego/multiple-kubel-buffers. The multi kubel buffer works for me, with each buffer having a different configuration of cluster/namespace/resource.

There are many changes on my branch (single process buffer, keymaps), and a lot of deleted code for things that I didn't care about (tramp, kubectl versions, etc). I hope someday I can rebase upstream and send a new PR again.

My usage:
kubel opens a new kubel buffer.
Then:
c to change context (with universal argument refresh contexts).
n to change namespace (with universal argument refresh namespaces).
r to change resource (with universal argument refresh resources).
x to call kubel-refresh and refresh current buffer.

I use only evil mode, not sure if my mapping changes without evil will work fine.

Let me know if it works for you @TxGVNN , I guess with more interest I can spend some cycles trying to bring back my branch.

[abrochard]

Hi yall, this is really cool!

I'm a bit swamped this week, but I will try to give it a review/test next week. And also see how the situation has evolved

[TxGVNN]

I was thinking I had time but ... :D

Anyway, I see the core of #57 sound good. We can rebase and fix bugs, remove extra things (as evil key, evil can be other PR), add kubel-switch-to-buffer to switch only kubel's buffers.

@d1egoaz What do you think if I can take your PR and create new one from my view, then you and @abrochard can review

[d1egoaz]

@d1egoaz What do you think if I can take your PR and create new one from my view, then you and @abrochard can review

For sure! go for it! My current branch (kubel) that I use have some more additional changes https://github.com/d1egoaz/kubel/tree/diego/multiple-kubel-buffers

[TxGVNN]

Thank you, @d1egoaz.

I close this issue and reopen for a new one at #114. Could you guys take a look?