You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Should an artifact automatically generate any tables/graphs that appear in a paper, or is it OK (or, perhaps even better, given the potential for mistakes in these scripts) for this to be a somewhat manual process?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Regardless of whether the process is manual, semi-automatic, or automatic, it should be documented in a way that allows reviewers to understand and reproduce how the tables/graphs were created from the data to be able to verify their correctness.
I think the "call for artifacts" should encourage the authors to make the steps automatic as much as possible. However, for manual steps, authors should be aware that reviewers should understand the artifact and judge its quality in a "reasonable" amount of time.
Should an artifact automatically generate any tables/graphs that appear in a paper, or is it OK (or, perhaps even better, given the potential for mistakes in these scripts) for this to be a somewhat manual process?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: