You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 13, 2023. It is now read-only.
Hi, I've integrated audit-check as a Github Action in a Rust project. However, the results are not identical to running cargo audit locally. For example, the following output is from Github Actions and no vulnerabilities nor warnings were found.
{"database":{"advisory-count":323,"last-commit":"67da87fc89b37912c25a32e4b647e1d6c576cdb9","last-updated":"2021-08-10T21:54:42Z"},"lockfile":{"dependency-count":161},"settings":{"target_arch":null,"target_os":null,"severity":null,"ignore":[],"informational_warnings":["unmaintained"],"package_scope":null},"vulnerabilities":{"found":false,"count":0,"list":[]},"warnings":{}}
No vulnerabilities were found
No warnings were found
Warnings are ignored based on how cargo audit is configured but the results will always output "No warnings were found". Thus, the output is misleading.
Can we enable information warnings by default, or make it configurable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, I've integrated audit-check as a Github Action in a Rust project. However, the results are not identical to running
cargo audit
locally. For example, the following output is from Github Actions and no vulnerabilities nor warnings were found.Warnings are ignored based on how
cargo audit
is configured but the results will always output "No warnings were found". Thus, the output is misleading.Can we enable information warnings by default, or make it configurable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: