-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 364
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NOT Closing issues / PRs immediately after adding the 'stale' label #71
Comments
I have the same problem! I enabled this action on my repository and a bunch of old issues were closed immediately when I had set |
sorry about this. I will go back and validate the old behavior but I think all you need to do is set days before close to the number of total days before close (not additive to the stale count). this may be a bug in v3. I'll check it out. |
this looks like a bug in the intended behavior since... forever? Looking at v1 I see the same behavior: https://github.com/actions/stale/blob/v1/src/main.ts but the configuration examples still seem to indicate it should not function that way. Hard to believe no one noticed the bug? Either way I'll fix it and republish a new version |
It hasn't been happening prior to v3 though 🤷 Just started after upgrading for me at least. |
I'm not sure. It would presumably close the issue the next time it ran, rather than right at the stale time. I just pushed a change to fix the behavior though so let me know if that fixes it (if you are pinned to v3 you'll get the fix). |
Hi there,
I have a comment related the issue #28.
🙏 for having implemented this a few days ago, but I am looking for the old behavior 😅
We are introducing this action on many repos that have stale issues for a very long time.
So I was expecting the behavior as it is sated in the configuration :
stale
and post a comment, which notifies the author.days-before-close
close the PR that has been marked stale,Would there be a way to get both behavior ?
May as @NBprojekt suggested with a value of
0
?Thanks again for your work 😄
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: