refactor: Use Core CKF extrapolation after inwards extension in Examples

[andiwand]

After changes in the Core CKF we are now able to use the extrapolated parameters from within the CKF and don't need to redo the work.

Pulled out of #3188 to capture the reference change and the performance

blocked by

• refactor!: Use track container in Core CKF and pass track proxies to delegates #3161

[github-actions]

📊: Physics performance monitoring for d992e27

Full contents

physmon summary

• ✅ CKF truth_smeared
• ✅ IVF truth_smeared
• ✅ AMVF truth_smeared
• ✅ Track Summary CKF truth_smeared
• ✅ Seeding truth_estimated
• ✅ CKF truth_estimated
• ✅ IVF truth_estimated
• ✅ AMVF truth_estimated
• ✅ Track Summary CKF truth_estimated
• ✅ Seeding seeded
• ✅ CKF seeded
• ✅ IVF seeded
• ✅ AMVF seeded
• ✅ AMVF (+grid seeder) seeded
• ✅ Track Summary CKF seeded
• ✅ Seeding orthogonal
• ✅ CKF orthogonal
• ✅ IVF orthogonal
• ✅ AMVF orthogonal
• ✅ Track Summary CKF orthogonal
• ✅ Ambisolver seeded
• ✅ Ambisolver orthogonal
• ✅ Seeding ttbar
• ✅ CKF ttbar
• ✅ Ambisolver
• ✅ Track Summary CKF ttbar
• ✅ AMVF ttbar
• ✅ AMVF (+grid seeder) ttbar
• ✅ Particles ttbar
• ✅ Vertices ttbar
• ✅ Truth tracking (GSF)
• ✅ Truth tracking
• ✅ Truth tracking (GX2F)
• ✅ Particles fatras
• ✅ Particles geant4

[andiwand]

[noemina]

Looks good to me. Approving.

[timadye]

I can do my usual ITk ttbar_pu200 test, but I don't think we have much in the way of resolution tests there.

[timadye]

The ITk ttbar_pu200 efficiency etc are not significantly changed by this PR. I can't speak to the resolutions. However I do see a 4.7% speedup :)

It's a long time since I looked into it, but would it be a big addition to add the performance analysis plots (where we can check resolutions) to the full_chain*.py tests? I think many people trying out ACTS could benefit from more detailed results.

ATLAS can test this out in Athena, so I guess it's not a top priority for us.

[andiwand]

It's a long time since I looked into it, but would it be a big addition to add the performance analysis plots (where we can check resolutions) to the full_chain*.py tests? I think many people trying out ACTS could benefit from more detailed results.

I think that makes sense yeah - I am reworking the root outputting a bit which somehow ended up at the very end of my current list of tasks but generally I would like to have finder and fitter performance for the CKF instead of "CKF performance" and track summary.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[acts-project-service]

🔴 Athena integration test results [555e6ce]

🔴 Some tests have failed!

Please investigate the pipeline!

status	job	report
🟢	report_pull_request
🟢	run_art_test: test_data18_13TeV_1000evt
🟢	run_art_test: test_ttbarPU40_reco
🟢	test_ActsDumpGeometryIdentifiers
🔴	test_ActsCheckObjectCountsCachedWorkflow
🔴	test_ActsCheckObjectCountsWorkflow
🟢	test_ActsEFTrackFit
🟢	test_ActsPersistifySeeds
🟢	test_ActsBenchmarkWithSpot
🟢	test_ActsAnalogueClustering
🟢	test_ActsWorkflowHeavyIons
🟢	test_ActsWorkflowFastTracking
🟢	test_ActsWorkflowCached
🟢	test_ActsWorkflow
🟢	test_ActsValidateAmbiguityResolution
🟢	test_ActsValidateResolvedTracks
🟢	test_ActsValidateTracks
🟢	test_ActsValidateActsCoreSpacePoints
🟢	test_ActsValidateActsSpacePoints
🟢	test_ActsValidateSeeds
🟢	test_ActsValidateOrthogonalSeeds
🟢	test_ActsValidateClusters
🟢	test_ActsPersistifyEDM
🟢	test_ActsGSFRefitting
🟢	test_ActsKfRefitting
🟢	test_ActsExtrapolationAlgTest
🟢	test_ActsITkTest
🟢	run_workflow_tests_run4_mc
🟢	run_workflow_tests_run2_mc
🟢	run_workflow_tests_run2_data
🟢	run_workflow_tests_run3_mc
🟢	run_workflow_tests_run3_data
🟢	run_unit_tests