-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 649
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
My curated issues on Source Han Serif v2.001 #155
Comments
Section A. Remap suggestionsFor the items below, I suggest to remap the affected regions to another glyph to better match the required regional standard (or the one chosen by the font). (Click to view items already fixed in v2.003)Issues affecting CN, TW and HK
Issues affecting TW and HK
^: HKSCS characters, out of scope for TW. Remap suggested anyway for better regional consistency. Issues affecting HK
Issues affecting HK(The items listed below are mostly fixed. The only remaining item is A13, currently the HK form is mapped to the TW CID)
|
Section B. New Glyph Assignment SuggestionsFor the following items, I believe a new glyph would be needed for the glyph to match the required regional standard or the one chosen by the font. Items affecting CN, TW and HK
Items affecting TW and HK
Items affecting HK
^: HKSCS characters, out of scope for TW. Remap suggested anyway for better regional consistency. |
My additional notes: A3 might probably need to have the JP glyph on all regions as per this issue. Then the CN glyph can be removed. A26 appears to have an EDB reference error showing 阱 instead of 阪. Maybe @tamcy needs to edit the graphic and reupload.
As for 琾 (U+743E), restore the v1 JP glyph to replace the CN glyph. For C1, the TW form, after adjustment, would also need to be mapped to JP and KR for aesthetics sake. Now onto the topic of unifying glyphs for the sake of reducing unnecessary CIDs (as far as I can without breaking China's 新字形 rule): As for A2, in the future I might need to make a new issue on As for A8 and A15, same as A2 A23, for the time being, I agree that the HK region should map to the CN form, but on whether the 八 component can be unified with CN dropping that Song-style detail from the second stroke in favour of the JP-style glyph shape, I wonder if it could be possible without breaking the 新字形 rule? UPDATE x2: I have made a new consolidated issue page concerning glyph unification. |
(All items in this comment have been fixed in v2.003. Click to view.)An update on 2022/3/3: As per HK's reference glyph and the stroke sequence shown in the Education Bureau website, the middle vertical stroke of 畢 is rendered/written as a single stroke, not two. Thus, for HK and TW, the standard/recommended stroke order/stroke form of this component differs in two ways:
However, 3 (out of 17) HK glyphs are found to have the middle vertical stroke separated: So I would like to suggest to have these 3 glyphs corrected:
Still on the same component, I found a possible regression of U+55F6 嗶 and U+6EED 滭 for TW: In v2.000 the 2 codepoints shared the JP glyph in v2.000, which is fine. In v2.001 they have their own glyph instances, but the 畢 component is now incorrect - the 田 now becomes a 日.
Thanks! |
First of all, congratulations and thank you for the hard work on the release of Source Han Serif v2.001! Here I am listing the issues I found as of version 2.001, which I think are all isolated cases.
Here I try to retrain from writing too many remarks if I think the sample image is enough to illustrate the problem, so please tell me if they are not obvious enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: