You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 17, 2023. It is now read-only.
It looks like filters on relations in selection sets can only filter by the by. This is somewhat useful, but vastly less than what is going to be needed for many use cases. Can we allow filters on relations in selection sets to have all of the capabilities of the filters on find queries? Limit, order by, paging, everything should be possible wherever filters are allowed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It looks like this is a problem with many to many relationships. Is it currently possible to do filtering in selection sets on a many to many relationship?
lastmjs
changed the title
More powerful selection set filtering on relations
More powerful selection set filtering on many to many relations
Jun 18, 2020
This might be a duplicate of this: #1343
This issue highlights the problem in a selection set, but under the hood the filtering might all be the same, not sure
Can we allow filters on relations in selection sets to have all of the capabilities of the filters on find queries? Limit, order by, paging, everything should be possible wherever filters are allowed
This looks like a duplicate of #1122. If so let's close this in favor of the other.
It looks like filters on relations in selection sets can only filter by the by. This is somewhat useful, but vastly less than what is going to be needed for many use cases. Can we allow filters on relations in selection sets to have all of the capabilities of the filters on
find
queries? Limit, order by, paging, everything should be possible wherever filters are allowedThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: