-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make provider attributes available in bids #124
Labels
P1
repo/akash-api
repo/node
Akash node repo issues
repo/provider
Akash provider-services repo issues
Comments
troian
added
repo/node
Akash node repo issues
repo/provider
Akash provider-services repo issues
repo/akash-api
P1
labels
Sep 13, 2023
Also, I think it would be a great idea to have something generic to handle other specs/attributes than GPUs, like the type of CPU offered or memory or disk etc etc. To not have to change the protobuf type later on. Something like an attribute array. |
anilmurty
changed the title
GPU model and vendor not returned in bid
Make GPU Model and Vendor Info available in bids
Oct 17, 2023
anilmurty
changed the title
Make GPU Model and Vendor Info available in bids
Make provider attributes available in bids
Oct 17, 2023
Oct 17 sync: This will need a network upgrade |
Oct 24 sync:
|
oct 31st:
|
Nov 7:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
P1
repo/akash-api
repo/node
Akash node repo issues
repo/provider
Akash provider-services repo issues
The scope of this is larger than just GPU attributes but GPU model is the biggest painpoint at this time.
When deploying for a GPU, the bid engine doesn't return the GPU model or vendor. This is crucial for users to know which provider to choose for which model, especially when deploying with a wildcard in the SDL.
Here's an example of a bid:
Also, if the protobuf types are to change for the bids, I think it would be a great idea to also add the model/vendor chosen on the deployment or lease. Currently on the deployment, we can see the model/vendor requested, but not the one leased.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: