You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for contributing this brilliant work! After constructing a BRON graph followed by your instructions, I found that the tactics only contain the "enterprise tactics", which is shown in https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/enterprise/
At the same time, MITRE ATT&CK also contains a group of "mobile tactics", as shown in https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/mobile/ . Does BRON also contain this part of tactics linking to techniques (then attack patterns -> CWEs -> etc) ?
Additionally, could I ask about how do you link the techniques (from MITRE ATT&CK) with attack patterns (from CAPEC)? It seems challenging to find data sources that directly link those two parts.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
BRON currently only includes the "enterprise tactics". However it should be possible to support the "mobile tactics" and then link to CAPEC etc. if there are links listed in the data sources
The technique-attack pattern link is indicated in the existing technique and attack pattern data sources. Yes it is challenging to infer links in BRON, for some attempts see https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.02618
Hi Dear Author,
Thanks for contributing this brilliant work! After constructing a BRON graph followed by your instructions, I found that the tactics only contain the "enterprise tactics", which is shown in https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/enterprise/
At the same time, MITRE ATT&CK also contains a group of "mobile tactics", as shown in https://attack.mitre.org/tactics/mobile/ . Does BRON also contain this part of tactics linking to techniques (then attack patterns -> CWEs -> etc) ?
Additionally, could I ask about how do you link the techniques (from MITRE ATT&CK) with attack patterns (from CAPEC)? It seems challenging to find data sources that directly link those two parts.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: