You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For each offered m= section, if any of the following conditions are true, the corresponding m= section in the answer MUST be marked as rejected by setting the port in the m= line to zero, as indicated in [RFC3264], Section 6, and further processing for this m= section can be skipped:
The associated RtpTransceiver has been stopped.
None of the offered media formats are supported and, if applicable, allowed by codec preferences.
The bundle policy is "max-bundle", and this is not the first m= section or in the same bundle group as the first m= section.
The bundle policy is "balanced", and this is not the first m= section for this media type or in the same bundle group as the first m= section for this media type.
This m= section is in a bundle group, and the group's offerer tagged m= section is being rejected due to one of the above reasons. This requires all m= sections in the bundle group to be rejected, as specified in [I-D.ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation], Section 7.3.3.
(emphasis mine)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related to #187, I noticed that when Str0m doesn't match any codecs for an m-line it still indicates that the m-line is okay to use.
I believe str0m should be rejecting the m-line by setting the port to 0 in the resulting SDP.
This is specified in section 5.3 of JSEP
(emphasis mine)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: