-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for multiple instances? #31
Comments
Good question, currently you would need to run multiple gwsocket instances using a different pipe. I'd need to look into having the ability to run one process but multiple pipes. |
By the way, I think this would be really useful for goaccess as it has been requested there as well. |
it would be a great enhancement, thank you again for looking into this! Also, may I ask if we can have the reference HTML/JS code that is demonstrated in the gif on the homepage which renders the WebSocket output perfectly? @allinurl thanks a lot! |
Now, If you are looking to have your full terminal output displayed in the browser, you need to load |
Here's the index file, just press |
This is somewhat related... I created a FreeBSD port that includes a https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247884 The port can be found at: https://github.com/tuaris/freebsd-gwsocket |
@tuaris Thanks for sharing that! |
Date: Sat Aug 15 05:30:41 2020 Log: (That's "it has now landed in FreeBSD ports") |
Suggestion: include the terminal example in the source code. |
Thanks for making gwsocket, it is a very cool and useful project! At the moment I understand we support 1 instance /tmp/wspipein.fifo -> terminal.html, is it possible we can support multiple instances as in we have
/tmp/wspipein-1.fifo -> terminal-1.html
/tmp/wspipein-2.fifo -> terminal-2.html
/tmp/wspipein-3.fifo -> terminal-3.html
with only have 1 gwsocket process running in the background?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: