Skip to content

Remove requirements-parser requirement - #3978

Merged
gsheni merged 9 commits into
mainfrom
fix_cli_reqs
Feb 3, 2023
Merged

gsheni merged 9 commits into
mainfrom
fix_cli_reqs

Conversation

@gsheni

@gsheni gsheni commented Feb 2, 2023 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gsheni gsheni changed the title Remove requirements parser requirement Remove requirements-parser requirement Feb 2, 2023
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Feb 2, 2023 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

Merging #3978 (55cb885) into main (d12659d) will decrease coverage by 0.0%.
The diff coverage is 93.8%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #3978     +/-   ##
=======================================
- Coverage   99.7%   99.7%   -0.0%     
=======================================
  Files        347     347             
  Lines      36892   36896      +4     
=======================================
+ Hits       36772   36775      +3     
- Misses       120     121      +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...components/transformers/encoders/target_encoder.py 100.0% <ø> (ø)
evalml/utils/cli_utils.py 95.9% <90.0%> (-1.3%) ⬇️
evalml/tests/utils_tests/test_cli_utils.py 100.0% <100.0%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@gsheni gsheni self-assigned this Feb 2, 2023
@gsheni
gsheni marked this pull request as ready for review February 2, 2023 22:15
@gsheni
gsheni requested review from a team and removed request for jeremyliweishih February 2, 2023 22:42
Comment thread evalml/utils/cli_utils.py
all_specs = ",".join(["".join(spec) for spec in package.specs])
name = package.name
if convert_to_conda and name in CONDA_TO_PIP_NAME:
name = CONDA_TO_PIP_NAME.get(package.name)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe not a big deal, but should we add a test (or parameterize the existing test if we can) to hit this line?

@jeremyliweishih jeremyliweishih left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM other than adding the missing coverage

@gsheni
gsheni merged commit a093df2 into main Feb 3, 2023
@gsheni
gsheni deleted the fix_cli_reqs branch February 3, 2023 15:51
@christopherbunn christopherbunn mentioned this pull request Feb 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove requirements parser requirement

3 participants