-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix a4a intersection observer #19838
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@erwinmombay I have one question, instead of returning a
JsonObject
, can we keep theRefreshConfig
defination, but have theconvertAndSanitizeConfiguration_
returns an object likeI don't feel that the namespace
continousTimeMin
andvisiblePercentageMin
is useful after the read. WDYT?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
im ok with that for the most part.
just a thought though, using refreshconfig here, somebody is going to get tripped up again i think at some point. having a
typedef
does not mean closure will preserve the key values, and "configurations" almost always crosses these boundaries (xhr, html, postmessage, iframe) and the other side is going to get garbled obfuscated keys.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I completely agree. I think this is a tradeoff between code size and style. Given this purely lives within extension code, I believe you're right to go with style.
Thought
typedef
is more about type checking. If we move toJsonObject
, is there a way to enforce type later?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is why
JsonObject
should be used at the boundaries and types/typedefs everywhere else. unfortunately, its a little hard for me to interpret this much code so its easier for me to justJsonObject
everything so that I don't make a mistake.did you mean you are OK with what I did, or do you prefer that i try to keep the
typedef
's ?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Talked offline. We agreed it's safest to use
JsonObject
for extern config at this point. I'll need to figure something out in the future. A read/write method that handle externs, that could be difficult to enforce.Anyhow this is something that needs further discussion. To fix the current issue, the PR looks good to me.