test in the CI #3

amtoine · 2023-06-16T09:18:37Z

⚠️ this is a test

as `cargo clippy` and `cargo test` already run with the `--workspace` option triggered, adding `--features` does not do anything.

# Description Fixes a small bug with `rm` where names of files which couldn't be deleted due to error were not printed. Fixes nushell#9004 # User-Facing Changes Slightly different error message than previously. Nothing significant, though. The new error message looks like this ``` ~/Projects/rust/nushell> rm /proc/1/mem 05/06/2023 01:13:23 PM Error: nu::shell::remove_not_possible × Remove not possible ╭─[entry #3:1:1] 1 │ rm /proc/1/mem · ─────┬───── · ╰── Could not delete /proc/1/mem: Operation not permitted (os error 1) ╰──── ``` or when using a glob (only showing a single entry for brevity) ``` Error: nu:🐚:remove_not_possible × Remove not possible ╭─[entry #2:1:1] 1 │ rm --recursive --force --verbose /proc/1/* · ────┬──── · ╰── Could not delete /proc/1/comm: Operation not permitted (os error 1) ╰──── ``` # Tests + Formatting No new unit tests were added for this change as it is pretty difficult to test this particular case. However, manual testing was run with the following commands ``` rm /proc/1/mem rm --recursive --force --verbose /proc/1/* ``` # After Submitting N/A

…ushell#10430) should close nushell#10406 # Description when writing a script, with variables you try to `ls` or `open`, you will get a "directory not found" error but the variable won't be expanded and you won't be able to see which one of the variable was the issue... this PR adds this information to the error. # User-Facing Changes let's define a variable ```nushell let does_not_exist = "i_do_not_exist_in_the_current_directory" ``` ### before ```nushell > open $does_not_exist Error: nu::shell::directory_not_found × Directory not found ╭─[entry #7:1:1] 1 │ open $does_not_exist · ───────┬─────── · ╰── directory not found ╰──── ``` ```nushell > ls $does_not_exist Error: nu:🐚:directory_not_found × Directory not found ╭─[entry #8:1:1] 1 │ ls $does_not_exist · ───────┬─────── · ╰── directory not found ╰──── ``` ### after ```nushell > open $does_not_exist Error: nu:🐚:directory_not_found × Directory not found ╭─[entry #3:1:1] 1 │ open $does_not_exist · ───────┬─────── · ╰── directory not found ╰──── help: /home/amtoine/documents/repos/github.com/amtoine/nushell/i_do_not_exist_in_the_current_directory does not exist ``` ```nushell > ls $does_not_exist Error: nu:🐚:directory_not_found × Directory not found ╭─[entry #4:1:1] 1 │ ls $does_not_exist · ───────┬─────── · ╰── directory not found ╰──── help: /home/amtoine/documents/repos/github.com/amtoine/nushell/i_do_not_exist_in_the_current_directory does not exist ``` # Tests + Formatting shouldn't harm anything 🤞 # After Submitting

errors look like ```nushell > update value (get value) Error: nu::shell::io_error × I/O error help: can't follow path '[String { val: "value", span: Span { start: 243376, end: 243381 }, optional: false }]' in empty stream ``` ```nushell > ^echo "foo" | get 0 Error: nu::shell::io_error × I/O error ╭─[entry #3:1:1] 1 │ ^echo "foo" | get 0 · ──┬─ · ╰── can't follow path '[Int { val: 0, span: Span { start: 243417, end: 243418 }, optional: false }]' in external stream ╰──── ```

should close nushell#10549 # Description this PR is twofold - uses `to nuon --raw` in the error messages to make sure nushell#10549 is solved and makes a difference between `"1"` and `1` - tries to introduce slightly better errors, i.e. by putting left / right on new lines => this should hopefully help when the values become a bit big 😋 # User-Facing Changes the original issue: ```nushell > assert equal {one:1 two:2} {one:"1" two:"2"} Error: × Assertion failed. ╭─[entry #3:1:1] 1 │ assert equal {one:1 two:2} {one:"1" two:"2"} · ───────────────┬─────────────── · ╰── These are not equal. Left : '{one: 1, two: 2}' Right : '{one: "1", two: "2"}' ╰──── ``` a sample for all the assertions and their new messages ```nushell > assert equal {one:1 two:2} {one:"1" two:"2"} Error: × Assertion failed. ╭─[entry #3:1:1] 1 │ assert equal {one:1 two:2} {one:"1" two:"2"} · ───────────────┬─────────────── · ╰── These are not equal. Left : '{one: 1, two: 2}' Right : '{one: "1", two: "2"}' ╰──── ``` ```nushell > assert equal 1 2 Error: × Assertion failed. ╭─[entry #4:1:1] 1 │ assert equal 1 2 · ─┬─ · ╰── These are not equal. Left : '1' Right : '2' ╰──── ``` ```nushell > assert less 3 1 Error: × Assertion failed. ╭─[entry #6:1:1] 1 │ assert less 3 1 · ─┬─ · ╰── The condition *left < right* is not satisfied. Left : '3' Right : '1' ╰──── ``` ```nushell > assert less or equal 3 1 Error: × Assertion failed. ╭─[entry #7:1:1] 1 │ assert less or equal 3 1 · ─┬─ · ╰── The condition *left <= right* is not satisfied. Left : '3' Right : '1' ╰──── ``` ```nushell > assert greater 1 3 Error: × Assertion failed. ╭─[entry #8:1:1] 1 │ assert greater 1 3 · ─┬─ · ╰── The condition *left > right* is not satisfied. Left : '1' Right : '3' ╰──── ``` ```nushell > assert greater or equal 1 3 Error: × Assertion failed. ╭─[entry nushell#9:1:1] 1 │ assert greater or equal 1 3 · ─┬─ · ╰── The condition *left < right* is not satisfied. Left : '1' Right : '3' ╰──── ``` ```nushell > assert length [1 2 3] 2 Error: × Assertion failed. ╭─[entry nushell#10:1:1] 1 │ assert length [1 2 3] 2 · ────┬──── · ╰── This does not have the correct length: value : [1, 2, 3] length : 3 expected : 2 ╰──── ``` ```nushell > assert length [1 "2" 3] 2 Error: × Assertion failed. ╭─[entry nushell#11:1:1] 1 │ assert length [1 "2" 3] 2 · ─────┬───── · ╰── This does not have the correct length: value : [1, "2", 3] length : 3 expected : 2 ╰──── ``` ```nushell > assert str contains "foo" "bar" Error: × Assertion failed. ╭─[entry nushell#13:1:1] 1 │ assert str contains "foo" "bar" · ─────┬───── · ╰── This does not contain '($right)'. value: "foo" ╰──── ``` # Tests + Formatting # After Submitting

# Description Currently, when writing a record, if you don't give the value for a field, the syntax error highlights the entire record instead of pinpointing the issue. Here's some examples: ```nushell > { a: 2, 3 } # Missing colon (and value) Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch × Parse mismatch during operation. ╭─[entry #2:1:1] 1 │ { a: 2, 3 } · ─────┬───── · ╰── expected record ╰──── > { a: 2, 3: } # Missing value Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch × Parse mismatch during operation. ╭─[entry #3:1:1] 1 │ { a: 2, 3: } · ──────┬───── · ╰── expected record ╰──── > { a: 2, 3 4 } # Missing colon Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch × Parse mismatch during operation. ╭─[entry #4:1:1] 1 │ { a: 2, 3 4 } · ──────┬────── · ╰── expected record ╰──── ``` In all of them, the entire record is highlighted red because an `Expr::Garbage` is returned covering that whole span: ![image](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/45539777/36660b50-23be-4353-b180-3f84eff3c220) This PR is for highlighting only the part inside the record that could not be parsed. If the record literal is big, an error message pointing to the start of where the parser thinks things went wrong should help people fix their code. # User-Facing Changes Below are screenshots of the new errors: If there's a stray record key right before the record ends, it highlights only that key and tells the user it expected a colon after it: ![image](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/45539777/94503256-8ea2-47dd-b69a-4b520c66f7b6) If the record ends before the value for the last field was given, it highlights the key and colon of that field and tells the user it expected a value after the colon: ![image](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/45539777/2f3837ec-3b35-4b81-8c57-706f8056ac04) If there are two consecutive expressions without a colon between them, it highlights everything from the second expression to the end of the record and tells the user it expected a colon. I was tempted to add a help message suggesting adding a colon in between, but that may not always be the right thing to do. ![image](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/45539777/1abaaaa8-1896-4909-bbb7-9a38cece5250) # Tests + Formatting # After Submitting

@kubouch

Closes nushell#11561 # Description  This PR will allow string interpolation at parse time. Since the actual config hasn't been loaded at parse time, this uses the `get_config()` method on `StateWorkingSet`. So file sizes and datetimes (I think those are the only things whose string representations depend on the config) may be formatted differently from how users have configured things, which may come as a surprise to some. It does seem unlikely that anyone would be formatting file sizes or date times at parse time. Still, something to think about if/before this PR merged. Also, I changed the `ModuleNotFound` error to include the name of the module. # User-Facing Changes  Users will be able to do stuff like: ```nu const x = [1 2 3] const y = $"foo($x)" // foo[1, 2, 3] ``` The main use case is `use`-ing and `source`-ing files at parse time: ```nu const file = "foo.nu" use $"($file)" ``` If the module isn't found, you'll see an error like this: ``` Error: nu::parser::module_not_found × Module not found. ╭─[entry #3:1:1] 1 │ use $"($file)" · ─────┬──── · ╰── module foo.nu not found ╰──── help: module files and their paths must be available before your script is run as parsing occurs before anything is evaluated ``` # Tests + Formatting  # After Submitting  Although there's user-facing changes, there's probably no need to change the docs since people probably already expect string interpolation to work at parse time. Edit: @kubouch pointed out that we'd need to document the fact that stuff like file sizes and datetimes won't get formatted according to user's runtime configs, so I'll make a PR to nushell.github.io after this one

amtoine added 4 commits June 16, 2023 11:14

remove the --features from the CI

87719fc

as `cargo clippy` and `cargo test` already run with the `--workspace` option triggered, adding `--features` does not do anything.

remove the useless nu-coverage job

26ad8b3

TEST: refactor clippy options in env variable

1be509c

be consistent in the env+strategy blocks

a915582

amtoine closed this Jun 18, 2023

amtoine deleted the foo branch June 23, 2023 16:39

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

test in the CI #3

test in the CI #3

amtoine commented Jun 16, 2023

test in the CI #3

test in the CI #3

Conversation

amtoine commented Jun 16, 2023

⚠️ this is a test