You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
we (Rust group @sslab-gatech) found a memory-safety/soundness issue in this crate while scanning Rust code on crates.io for potential vulnerabilities.
letmut len = try!(self.inner.read(&mutself.buf[..]));
self.len += len;
if len < self.block_len{
unsafe{self.buf.set_len(len);};
let reader:P = (self.padder)(self.len);
len += try!(reader.read_pad(&mutself.buf));
//assert_eq!(self.buf.len(), self.block_len);
self.finished = true;
}
utils::Digest::to_bytes_len() method & utils::PadBlocks::<I, P, F>::fill_buf() create an uninitialized buffer and passes it to user-provided Read implementation or user-provided reader.read_pad(). This is unsound, because it allows safe Rust code to exhibit an undefined behavior (read from uninitialized memory).
In case a user-provided Read reads from the given buffer, uninitialized buffer can make safe Rust code to cause memory safety errors by miscompilation. Uninitialized values are lowered to LLVM as llvm::UndefValue which may take different random values for each read. Propagation of UndefValue can quickly cause safe Rust code to exhibit undefined behavior.
This part from the Read trait documentation explains the issue:
It is your responsibility to make sure that buf is initialized before calling read. Calling read with an uninitialized buf (of the kind one obtains via MaybeUninit<T>) is not safe, and can lead to undefined behavior.
How to fix the issue?
The Naive & safe way to fix the issue is to always zero-initialize a buffer before lending it to a user-provided Read implementation. Note that this approach will add runtime performance overhead of zero-initializing the buffer.
As of Feb 2021, there is not yet an ideal fix that works with no performance overhead. Below are links to relevant discussions & suggestions for the fix.
Hello,
we (Rust group @sslab-gatech) found a memory-safety/soundness issue in this crate while scanning Rust code on crates.io for potential vulnerabilities.
Issue Description
rust-sha/src/utils.rs
Lines 19 to 24 in 03bfd55
rust-sha/src/utils.rs
Lines 100 to 111 in 03bfd55
utils::Digest::to_bytes_len()
method &utils::PadBlocks::<I, P, F>::fill_buf()
create an uninitialized buffer and passes it to user-providedRead
implementation or user-providedreader.read_pad()
. This is unsound, because it allows safe Rust code to exhibit an undefined behavior (read from uninitialized memory).In case a user-provided
Read
reads from the given buffer, uninitialized buffer can make safe Rust code to cause memory safety errors by miscompilation. Uninitialized values are lowered to LLVM asllvm::UndefValue
which may take different random values for each read. Propagation ofUndefValue
can quickly cause safe Rust code to exhibit undefined behavior.This part from the
Read
trait documentation explains the issue:How to fix the issue?
The Naive & safe way to fix the issue is to always zero-initialize a buffer before lending it to a user-provided
Read
implementation. Note that this approach will add runtime performance overhead of zero-initializing the buffer.As of Feb 2021, there is not yet an ideal fix that works with no performance overhead. Below are links to relevant discussions & suggestions for the fix.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: