Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

perf(core): be more consistent about typeof checks #28400

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bmeurer
Copy link
Contributor

@bmeurer bmeurer commented Jan 28, 2019

When testing whether value is an object, use the ideal sequence of
strictly not equal to null followed by typeof value === 'object'
consistently. Specifically there's no point in using double equal with
null since undefined is ruled out by the typeof check.

Also avoid the unnecessary ToBoolean check on value.ngOnDestroy in
hasOnDestroy(), since the typeof value.ngOnDestroy === 'function'
will only let closures pass and all closures are truish (with the
notable exception of document.all, but that shouldn't be relevant
for the ngOnDestroy hook).

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • angular.io application / infrastructure changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

When testing whether `value` is an object, use the ideal sequence of
strictly not equal to `null` followed by `typeof value === 'object'`
consistently. Specifically there's no point in using double equal with
`null` since `undefined` is ruled out by the `typeof` check.

Also avoid the unnecessary ToBoolean check on `value.ngOnDestroy` in
`hasOnDestroy()`, since the `typeof value.ngOnDestroy === 'function'`
will only let closures pass and all closures are truish (with the
notable exception of `document.all`, but that shouldn't be relevant
for the `ngOnDestroy` hook).
@bmeurer bmeurer requested a review from a team as a code owner January 28, 2019 14:20
@pkozlowski-opensource pkozlowski-opensource added target: major This PR is targeted for the next major release comp: ivy labels Jan 29, 2019
@ngbot ngbot bot added this to the needsTriage milestone Jan 29, 2019
Copy link
Member

@pkozlowski-opensource pkozlowski-opensource left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thnx. Please keep those PRs coming, much appreciated!

@pkozlowski-opensource pkozlowski-opensource added action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker merge: caretaker note Alert the caretaker performing the merge to check the PR for an out of normal action needed or note labels Jan 29, 2019
@pkozlowski-opensource
Copy link
Member

merge-assistance as it needs g3 presubmit

@jasonaden jasonaden closed this in 9af18c2 Jan 29, 2019
@bmeurer bmeurer deleted the perf_typeof_object branch January 30, 2019 05:33
@bmeurer
Copy link
Contributor Author

bmeurer commented Jan 30, 2019

Thanks 👍

vetom pushed a commit to vetom/angular that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2019
When testing whether `value` is an object, use the ideal sequence of
strictly not equal to `null` followed by `typeof value === 'object'`
consistently. Specifically there's no point in using double equal with
`null` since `undefined` is ruled out by the `typeof` check.

Also avoid the unnecessary ToBoolean check on `value.ngOnDestroy` in
`hasOnDestroy()`, since the `typeof value.ngOnDestroy === 'function'`
will only let closures pass and all closures are truish (with the
notable exception of `document.all`, but that shouldn't be relevant
for the `ngOnDestroy` hook).

PR Close angular#28400
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 14, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes merge: caretaker note Alert the caretaker performing the merge to check the PR for an out of normal action needed or note target: major This PR is targeted for the next major release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants