feat: start Reviewer port

[BrayanDSO]

Purpose / Description

I was going to finish it locally before pushing to avoid churn if I decide to refactor something, but I ended up procrastinating because of it. So, done is better than perfect.

It is currently a developer option. The design features are going to be implemented incrementally to ease the reviewing process and discussion.

When enough features are implemented, my plan is to move it into Settings > Advanced > Experimental

Right now it rate cards and exits when finished. Awesome, isn't it?

Fixes

• Part of Port Anki Desktop reviewer #14302

Approach

In the commits

How Has This Been Tested?

Emulator 34:

Light theme screenshot

reviewer.webm

Learning (optional, can help others)

Describe the research stage

Links to blog posts, patterns, libraries or addons used to solve this problem

Checklist

Please, go through these checks before submitting the PR.

• You have a descriptive commit message with a short title (first line, max 50 chars).
• You have commented your code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• You have performed a self-review of your own code
• UI changes: include screenshots of all affected screens (in particular showing any new or changed strings)
• UI Changes: You have tested your change using the Google Accessibility Scanner

[BrayanDSO]

I haven't chosen the dark mode colors for the answer buttons yet, and choosing colors take time. Open to suggestions, but definitely don't want to bikeshed the PR because of colors. That always can be changed later

[criticalAY]

UI: (Ik its in development mode but still pointing it out just in case) The answer button are bit overflowing ig ?

[BrayanDSO]

Current layout plan:

[criticalAY]

I meant

the layout above and the buttons layout is not aligned here

[criticalAY]

Current layout plan:

This is the updated one in the PR or you plan to have it this way, as it has perfect alignment

[BrayanDSO]

didn't copy that part when branching. Updated it. Thanks! (note: haven't updated the video )

[david-allison]

LGTM, one question

• Note: [Bug] OnRenderProcessGone is not handled by Anki Desktop WebViews #15695 needs to be prioritized

[david-allison]

LGTM, with the understanding that this is development only

No point in blocking

Only encouragement is to add more tests - now is a great opportunity to improve coverage

[david-allison]

No copyright?

[BrayanDSO]

It's basically a copy of ReviewerTest, which doesn't have an author in the copyright header, and I didn't want to license it all under myself

[lukstbit]

Also LGTM. UI design issues can be discussed later.