Replies: 0 comments 1 reply
-
Look at the issue https://github.com/anoma/juvix/issues/274. We are planning to work on that soon. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In Minijuvix to express mutually recursive functions one puts their signature before the body
This however will have issues when one has general inference. Ideally minijuvix can tell you the signature of these two functions. Given that HM inference is had.
Thus it would be good to be able to write
and have minijuvix tell you the types. This however requires a syntax change.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions